• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Minor Maou CRT.

Status
Not open for further replies.
When determining something like this, I usually try to see if there is a statement regarding everyone can do the same thing or close to that. Now there are verses where everyone has the same energy system but some abilities are different, the best why to do this would be having a description that outright states, implies or showcases various users doing the same thing (No, I'm not saying grab like 20+ scans). Usually the verse would have characters be surprised if someone did something that others couldn't despite them having the same stuff. I think the blog adding the lines like skilled users can do this, as well as the low tiers, mid tier and so on can do works well in that regard. I'm not knowledgeable on the series so it's not like I can provide examples of counter points so I'd rather leave that to the knowledgeable users.

I'm overall fine with the blogs addition, and in the future if the new profiles this thing would apply to are showing contradiction in like being surprised at a specific ability that they themselves should have, it can be easily discussed and removed.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top