• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Marvel Comics: Molecule Man rework

Status
Not open for further replies.

Confluctor

VS Battles
Retired
12,662
9,597
Here is my rework of his page

At a glance:
  • Shit ton of new abilities and stuff
  • New key
  • There is no need for "Unknown" physically or whatever, my man has a varied mechanism and can bring his powers and up and down, so that thing is wrong, and as such, gone. Reduced to atoms
  • a lot of scans, references, and justifications, etc, etc

By the way, for his last key, do we need to add a tier for his universal pieces? Although their tiering is unknown. But I did leave a note about an Owen dying in Slott's F4, which is... well, not the actual one, but a universal piece of his. Like an M Body sort of thing.


Btw, I would rather not see a single mention of "cosmology too high, and should be reduced". Until you guys actually do the split, never bring it up as it is not relevant here. Thanks.
 
It looks good to me at least. Should I use my usual notification list for members knowledgeable about Marvel and DC Comics then? I have already used it twice today though.
 
I think that you have probably received sufficient agreements to apply this revision now.
 
Okay. I will do so. Thank you for helping out.

Should we close this thread as well now then?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top