Mario (Illumination) | Goodbye Class M

[Demon_Lord18]

It was accepted here that Class M should be removed from the profiles because the feat is not quantifiable. I was going to remove it (since it hasn't been removed yet), but as I don't have knowledge about the verse, I decided to make this CRT to know what the current class of the characters that drank from this source would be, since it is now dry.

 

[Accelerated_Evolution]

The downgrade is fine, the main thing now is to make a calc group member evaluate Bowser's Class 50 feat (Which was linked on the previous thread)

I think it should be fine to scale DK-level characters (Literally only DK himself and Cat Mario) to the Superhuman feat linked on the latter's profile

 

[Demon_Lord18]

The downgrade is fine, the main thing now is to make a calc group member evaluate Bowser's Class 50 feat (Which was linked on the previous thread)

I think it should be fine to scale DK-level characters (Literally only DK himself and Cat Mario) to the Superhuman feat linked on the latter's profile

We already have an accepted calculation for that feat, although "recently" a CGM has disputed some things in the calculation

Edit: It was in 2023 that he disputed something in the calculation and it was not answered.
https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/User_blog:Dalesean027/Bowser_throws_a_large_rock

 

[SeijiSetto]

We already have an accepted calculation for that feat, although "recently" a CGM has disputed some things in the calculation

Edit: It was in 2023 that he disputed something in the calculation and it was not answered.
https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/User_blog:Dalesean027/Bowser_throws_a_large_rock

I looked, the issue is that Dalesean didn't divide the rock's diameter by 2 to get its radius before plugging it into the formula for volume.
(Additionally, for acceleration you'd wanna take the speed calculated (16.something m/s) and then divide THAT by 0.84s, then use that for F=ma)

@Dalesean027 see above

 

[ARCH0207]

Bowser throws a rock
I took the time to redo the calculation, because the volume does not make sense, since it says that it is a spherical lid and using the spherical lid formula it is 5.5 m³ not 17.03 m³, and that blog does not have a formula.

 

[Dalesean027]

I looked, the issue is that Dalesean didn't divide the rock's diameter by 2 to get its radius before plugging it into the formula for volume.
(Additionally, for acceleration you'd wanna take the speed calculated (16.something m/s) and then divide THAT by 0.84s, then use that for F=ma)

@Dalesean027 see above

updated and the class M can go

 

[Omnificence]

I looked, the issue is that Dalesean didn't divide the rock's diameter by 2 to get its radius before plugging it into the formula for volume.
(Additionally, for acceleration you'd wanna take the speed calculated (16.something m/s) and then divide THAT by 0.84s, then use that for F=ma)

@Dalesean027 see above

updated and the class M can go

I don't have a problem with this downgrade; however, as long as there's an alternative way to calculate it and/or provide a more reasonable result lower than what I got when I calculated it, I'd still like to keep it on the profiles.

Neutral for now, but open towards agreeing.

 

[SeijiSetto]

updated and the class M can go

all good then, i've approved

 

[Omnificence]

all good then, i've approved

Is there any other way I can calculate it or make it acceptable? If not, then I'm fine with it.

 

[ARCH0207]

Ready, I already modified the strength of Mario and Donkey Kong in their profiles, now they are class 50 because they are comparable to Bowser.

 

[Demon_Lord18]

Ready, I already modified the strength of Mario and Donkey Kong in their profiles, now they are class 50 because they are comparable to Bowser.

Dude, you should always add the link to the CRT where the changes were accepted

 

[Demon_Lord18]

Is there any other way I can calculate it or make it acceptable? If not, then I'm fine with it.

From what Bambu said, I don't think so

 

[ARCH0207]

Ready, I already modified the strength of Mario and Donkey Kong in their profiles, now they are class 50 because they are comparable to Bowser.
Donkey Kong
Mario

 

[Accelerated_Evolution]

Ready, I already modified the strength of Mario and Donkey Kong in their profiles, now they are class 50 because they are comparable to Bowser.
Donkey Kong
Mario

Donkey Kong ins't comparable to Bowser, on their only fight in the movie DK was stomped by him

 

[ARCH0207]

So, Donkey Kong is class 25?

 

[Demon_Lord18]

So, Donkey Kong is class 25?

No, he's just superhuman for lifting a giant barrel.

 

[ARCH0207]

You're right, I take you at your word.

 

[ARCH0207]

As for Mario?
He stays in class 50, because the super star without her is just like Donkey Kong, it's a superhuman level.

 

[ARCH0207]

Ready, I already modified Donkey Kong's profile, it's already superhuman level
Donkey Kong

 

[DaReaperMan]

Ready, I already modified Donkey Kong's profile, it's already superhuman level
Donkey Kong

You can't edit yet, neither mods who commented are evaluation staff.

As for the OP, it's fine. I'm more of a games guy and haven't seen the movie but yeah.

 

[ARCH0207]

Taking advantage, also in Bowser's profile, we must remove the fact that he is City-Block because of his super cannon, since that level is from Bowser's cannon but not Bowser's.
It's like saying that Oppenhaimer is 7-C Low, because of the Hiroshima and Nagasaki bombs.

 

[Demon_Lord18]

Taking advantage, also in Bowser's profile, we must remove the fact that he is City-Block because of his super cannon, since that level is from Bowser's cannon but not Bowser's.
It's like saying that Oppenhaimer is 7-C Low, because of the Hiroshima and Nagasaki bombs.

Oppenheimer would be 10-B physically, 7-C with Nuclear weapon

The Browser profile looks like this, it is not physically listed as 8-B

 

[ARCH0207]

I don't know why, they deleted my changes to the Donkey Kong and Mario profiles, but it is already accepted.

 

[Accelerated_Evolution]

I don't know why, they deleted my changes to the Donkey Kong and Mario profiles, but it is already accepted.

You can't edit yet, neither mods who commented are evaluation staff.

Staff with evaluation rights (Thread Mods, Admins or Burecrauts) should evaluate this thread for the Class 50 change to be applied

 

[ARCH0207]

Antvasima is coming right now to close it.

 

[Antvasima]

This seems fine to apply.

 

[ARCH0207]

@Antvasima
You can now close the thread to be the changes, please

 

[ARCH0207]

Now that Antvasima approved it, now I am going to make the changes

 

[Antvasima]

We tend to close threads first after accepted revisions have been properly applied.

 

[DaReaperMan]

So Ant makes one acceptance

 

[Antvasima]

Well, it seems like a few calc group members evaluated this as well, but yes, I suppose we need more than that.

 

[DaReaperMan]

Well, it seems like a few calc group members evaluated this as well, but yes, I suppose we need more than that.

It is your rules that only Thread Mods, Administrators, and Bureaucrats have eval rights!

 

[ARCH0207]

I have already made the changes again and this time they do not release it, Antvasima has already accepted it.
Donkey Kong
Mario

 

[DaReaperMan]

I have already made the changes again and this time they do not release it, Antvasima has already accepted it.
Donkey Kong
Mario

Well, it seems like a few calc group members evaluated this as well, but yes, I suppose we need more than that.

except you need two.

 

[DarkDragonMedeus]

There were two threads proposing the same thing, but as I said there. Appears to be a cog in a machine situation, so this is fine.

 

[Antvasima]

It is your rules that only Thread Mods, Administrators, and Bureaucrats have eval rights!

Yes. I thought that this was a calc group related issue. My apologies.

I have already made the changes again and this time they do not release it, Antvasima has already accepted it.
Donkey Kong
Mario

I don't have the rights to accept content revision threads on my own though, unless they are minor or very self-evident changes.

There were two threads proposing the same thing, but as I said there. Appears to be a cog in a machine situation, so this is fine.

Thank you for helping out. Is this sufficient, or should we wait for one more?