Low 2-C Quick Basic Question

[LuisGeno]

Good day. Sorry if I keep pestering you with "basic" questions about the level system, but I have to ask; If there is a whole space-time continuum (of infinite size), is it necessary to demonstrate the qualitative superiority of the temporal dimension over the 3 spatial dimensions to qualify as Universal+?

 

[Magicomethkuon]

Good day. Sorry if I keep pestering you with "basic" questions about the level system, but I have to ask; If there is a whole space-time continuum (of infinite size), is it necessary to demonstrate the qualitative superiority of the temporal dimension over the 3 spatial dimensions to qualify as Universal+?

Save the unusual exception, universal space-time continua are infinite. You also specified infinite yourself. For any given universe, time encompasses all of its past, present and future. So yes, that is a 4 dimensional construct and you don't need to demonstrate anything else for it to qualify as Low 2-C.

 

[Quantu]

^ He's right in the sense that what you said is enough. An infinite sized space-time continuum would be Tier 2 by default since it's > the required universal scale.

 

[LuisGeno]

I'm sorry. What happens is that I don't understand something; So does a hypothetical temporal 4D automatically have a qualitative superiority to 3D space, as long as that 3D is of infinite size? What happens is that the wiki says this: "create and/or destroy an area of space that is qualitatively larger than three-dimensional space of infinite size". So, I thought that additional proof of qualitative superiority was needed, or is there something I don't know here, and that's why I'm getting confused?

 

[Shiraito983]

I'm sorry. What happens is that I don't understand something; So does a hypothetical temporal 4D automatically have a qualitative superiority to 3D space, as long as that 3D is of infinite size? What happens is that the wiki says this: "create and/or destroy an area of space that is qualitatively larger than three-dimensional space of infinite size". So, I thought that additional proof of qualitative superiority was needed, or is there something I don't know here, and that's why I'm getting confused?

qualitative superiority was needed for 5D above. not for l2c

 

[LuisGeno]

Ohhh, okay, thank you very much for the answer.