• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Status
Not open for further replies.
I've mostly forgotten, but I think this went back to the R>F policies and ones that truly meet criteria are 1-A. But unsure if this qualifies. But I do not mind the Low 2-C minimum stuff. Unsure about 2-B, but it seems Low 1-C would be rejected either direction however.
About 3 days ago a lore-bomb of an event dropped in the canon interquel Shadow Fight: Shades game that pretty much turned all of Underworld and its characters canon overnight. They are simply considered as part of a different timeline from what we see going on in Shadow Fight: Shades, Shadow Fight 3 and Shadow Fight Arena (along with the Vector games and SPINE, technically). Aka some random character from say Shadow Fight 3 could randomly end up in Shadow Fight 2: Underworld's world through a dimensional portal because now they exist in the same narrative macrocosm.

The implications of this are kind of crazy for Architect in particular, considering how the cosmology in Shadow Fight 3 is a casually low-balled 500.000.000 timelines (each containing 1000 different timelines / universes on their own) structure that is described as 2-A at some point. Stuff that he still considers as fiction and created by him on a whim.
 
The implications of this are kind of crazy for Architect in particular, considering how the cosmology in Shadow Fight 3 is a casually low-balled 500.000.000 timelines (each containing 1000 different timelines / universes on their own) structure that is described as 2-A at some point. Stuff that he still considers as fiction and created by him on a whim.
That's an easy "2-B, possibly 2-A" scaling chain, if we consider architect strictly only scales to his verse, then reality equalisation wouldn't be a thing.
 
About 3 days ago a lore-bomb of an event dropped in the canon interquel Shadow Fight: Shades game that pretty much turned all of Underworld and its characters canon overnight. They are simply considered as part of a different timeline from what we see going on in Shadow Fight: Shades, Shadow Fight 3 and Shadow Fight Arena (along with the Vector games and SPINE, technically). Aka some random character from say Shadow Fight 3 could randomly end up in Shadow Fight 2: Underworld's world through a dimensional portal because now they exist in the same narrative macrocosm.

The implications of this are kind of crazy for Architect in particular, considering how the cosmology in Shadow Fight 3 is a casually low-balled 500.000.000 timelines (each containing 1000 different timelines / universes on their own) structure that is described as 2-A at some point. Stuff that he still considers as fiction and created by him on a whim.
So what exactly do you think should be done here, more specifically?
 
Also, should we keep both of the current Shadow Fight content revision threads open or keep the discussion contained to one of them only?

 
Maybe it would be best to merge both this thread and the one you linked with this one, since it tackles both threads' subjects and is relatively more active.

So that would mean closing this thread and the Low 1-C one.
Okay. I will close these threads then. 🙏

As Dashio said, we will continue here instead:

 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top