Oh, another thing, you don't need to view an infinite number of Low 2-C timelines as infinitesimal to qualify as Low 1-C, you need to view just one as infinitesimal to your existence (Like, view it as a point on a piece of paper or something similar) and exist one level of infinite superiority above it.
So viewing an infinite number of low 2-C structures (ie; a 2-A structure) as finite would be good enough for low 1-C?
That alone ain't enough, you need statements of it viewing the smaller realm as "infinitesimal to its own existence, surpassing and transcending it altogether" combined or some shit like that, alongside the good old "exists one plane of existence higher than the smaller realm". You need both of these.
Honestly, you don't exactly need all of those. Simply being stated to be bigger than a 2-A structure (or that it is smaller than you) is enough, and the most easy way to get it I think, but needs to be stated. This is the example I always use but it works.
Well you don't necessarily need a 2-A structure to do the trick either. So I gave some of the other examples I have experienced.
You are indeed correct, it does. Hence why I said you don't need to view a 2-A structure as infinitely smaller than you to qualify for Low 1-C, simply viewing a Low 2-C timeline as smaller than you would be more than enough.
Not as far as I have experienced. Statements would indeed be required for not just being infinitely bigger, but also requiring additional statements of surpassing and transcending space and time themselves or existing on a higher level of existence than those two.
Which is where Ultima's "superiority statements" comment comes in.
