• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
I think this is a "Kwami physiology blog" there are many for other verses and I think this one should be better formatted.
You should separate abilities for their true abstract selves and another for their avatars.
Also feel like this is very lacking in abilities Kwamis should get a bunch of degrees of immortality. Also I don't think that's evidence of Kwamis being omnipresent, they existing in every universe doesn't mean they are everywhere within that universe.
 
I think this is a "Kwami physiology blog" there are many for other verses and I think this one should be better formatted.
You should separate abilities for their true abstract selves and another for their avatars.
Also feel like this is very lacking in abilities Kwamis should get a bunch of degrees of immortality. Also I don't think that's evidence of Kwamis being omnipresent, they existing in every universe doesn't mean they are everywhere within that universe.
Aaight
 
The scan seems to be lacking, especially the loads of Immortality they got and none of it has evidence to justify it. As for Abstract Existence, I don't think it qualified to a certain types, it couldn't be Type 1 because they're not the abstract aspect of it themself... It Also couldn't be Type 2, as they don't have a certain reliability to said aspect, or they've been empowered by it we don't even know.

Omnipresence should be changed to Multilocation.
 
The scan seems to be lacking, especially the loads of Immortality they got and none of it has evidence to justify it. As for Abstract Existence, I don't think it qualified to a certain types, it couldn't be Type 1 because they're not the abstract aspect of it themself... It Also couldn't be Type 2, as they don't have a certain reliability to said aspect, or they're empowered by it.

Omnipresence should be changed to Multilocation.
i just added that and im in the middle of edting everything.
 
The scan seems to be lacking, especially the loads of Immortality they got and none of it has evidence to justify it. As for Abstract Existence, I don't think it qualified to a certain types, it couldn't be Type 1 because they're not the abstract aspect of it themself... It Also couldn't be Type 2, as they don't have a certain reliability to said aspect, or they've been empowered by it we don't even know.

Omnipresence should be changed to Multilocation.
They are the abstract aspect of it themselves in their true forms.
 
They are the abstract aspect of it themselves in their true forms.
I don't see that in the scan, to what I understand, they're abstract not in the sense they embodied or empowered by abstract nature and is one with it, but rather in the sense of them being invisible and can be visible if they really wanted to.
 
I don't see that in the scan, to what I understand, they're abstract not in the sense they embodied or empowered by abstract nature and is one with it, but rather in the sense of them being invisible and can be visible if they really wanted to.
that doesn't correlate at all with the fact that when a new concept is formed within the universe, a kwami is born with it, being the aspect of said concept.
 
that doesn't correlate at all with the fact that when a new concept is formed within the universe, a kwami is born with it, being the aspect of said concept.
That really doesn't prove anything though? You can say the concept of existence is born in the universe, and all existence too came in, but that doesn't mean they're an embodiment of it nor do they got empowered by the concept itself.
 
That really doesn't prove anything though? You can say the concept of existence is born in the universe, and all existence too came in, but that doesn't mean they're an embodiment of it nor do they got empowered by the concept itself.
its a co-tangent process that happens. and its pretty evident by the scans.
 
its a co-tangent process that happens. and its pretty evident by the scans.
What the hell is "co-tangent"? The scan you presented is more common in fiction that applies Incorporeality, Invisibility and such, but that doesn't mean they're an aspect of nature nor do they represent/personification as one nonetheless.
 
What the hell is "co-tangent"? The scan you presented is more common in fiction that applies Incorporeality, Invisibility and such, but that doesn't mean they're an aspect of nature nor do they represent/personification as one nonetheless.
co-tangent is gonna be something which is gonna be ontologically tied to the original tangent(cause). Lets put it in variables.

Lets say we have event A. Event A is going to have a result that is C. When C exists then KW also exists. C's ontology is the reason for KW's existence.

When the Universe was created, the kwami was creation was also born into the world. Kwami's are the abstract concept of what they represent.
 
Lets say we have event A. Event A is going to have a result that is C. When C exists then KW also exists. C's ontology is the reason for KW's existence.

When the Universe was created, the kwami was creation was also born into the world. Kwami's are the abstract concept of what they represent.
One thing about Abstract Type 2 is you need an abstract nature to be one with you, not you (the results) to be one with it. Because it's basic and generics, all of us are part of a higher concept, that doesn't make our existence are abstract in nature.

They didn't represent anything. They doesn't get the basic benefit of being the abstraction, heck, the fact that they all are the equivalent in power (I don't know, but if it is this proves the AE2 being wrong) means they actually didn't being a personification of it.
 
One thing about Abstract Type 2 is you need an abstract nature to be one with you, not you (the results) to be one with it. Because it's basic and generics, all of us are part of a higher concept, that doesn't make our existence are abstract in nature.

They didn't represent anything. They doesn't get the basic benefit of being the abstraction, heck, the fact that they all are the equivalent in power (I don't know, but if it is this proves the AE2 being wrong) means they actually didn't being a personification of it.
they, in themselves, would have this via their ontology 💀
 
Kwami should have acausality type 3 since every version of themselves in the multiverse is the same Kwami.
 
I'm not sure what exactly you're trying to revise here. If you're trying to make a Kwami physiology page, I think the blog is too barebones and incoherent for it.
 
I'm not sure what exactly you're trying to revise here. If you're trying to make a Kwami physiology page, I think the blog is too barebones and incoherent for it.
I have only been editing pages for about a year so my formatting isn't that well just yet! I will probably have somebody else make a better blog. Would it be better to close the thread?
 
That line of reasoning doesn't even track like what 😭 what's gonna be the argument for them not getting type 3 ac
Acausality 3 need these Kwami's to be different in the sense they're NOT THE SAME ENTITY IN A DIFFERENT PLACE. Basically a counterpart, but connected, and will replace them each time they die.

The thing is, it's not, just look up the page yourself. It fits Multilocation more than these Acausality 3 bs.
 
Back
Top