The issue with these quibbles given by JJK opponents is they’re just using pedantry to justify a kind of a ridiculous way of reading the text? They can’t deny that Yuki’s black hole is, of course, a black hole, because it’s incredibly blatant and suffices for any standards you would reasonably impose on those things. But they say it can’t be counted as a black hole in those panels because of quibbles that are clearly just artistic license? And their explanation for what is going on in those panels are absolutely nonsensical, ljke “uh she created a strong gravitational field and it drew a bunch of matter to her and the matter got super compressed and looked like that”. Something like that is obviously bad faith, nobody reads that panel and thinks that is what Gege is trying to portray.
Often, it seems, opponents will keep spamming these silly issues without even bothering to explain what is actually supposed to be being represented there. They just hope that being anally retentive about artistic representation should suffice, I want people who approach the issue this way to step back and think if they’re really going about things in an unbiased way when they do that.