- 826
- 63
So I noticed this site uses calculations from websites like Narutoforums to calculate a character's destructive capabilities, durability etc. While at times I feel this is straight-forward and makes perfect sense, other times it seems like they're just looking too much into it to the point where it seems out of place from the author's original intention for the character's strength. Do you really think an author or artist draws everything to scale and is like "yep, by calculation the circumfrence of this and the pixels of this I can deduct that this character is definetly a planet-buster just like I intended". But it's not even that I have a problem with. It's the fact that once that happens the other characters in the series tend to get powerscaled accordingly. Whereas using convoluted scientific calculations to determine a character's strength is one thing (that can be a huge outlier and misrepresentation of a character a lot of the time), to say all other characters are similar to that is a downright insult to the author. It's like we're letting a calculation that might misrepresent a certain characters do it for the entire verse. Once a character has some narutoforum calculation deeming them a country-buster even if they've struggled against far weaker enemies and there's no reason for an upgrade that big, the entire verse gets to that level.
Let's take the way Mario from Super Mario Galaxy is somehow a Galaxy-buster. Don't you find that a misrepresentation? Doesn't that go against Mario being one-shotted by Kamek? If not, then wouldn't that make Kamek a multi-galaxy buster? Then why wouldn't Bowser use Kamek to aid him in destroying galaxies and why wouldn't all the other Mario enemies be put at a similar level? Galaxy-buster Goomba anyone? And this is true for other series. If Megaman is a small planet buster wouldn't he simply obliterate Willy's castle without even needing to go inside? You see. Using calculations and powerscaling so loosely creates more confusion and outliers than not. This website seems to have a problem with outliers. It treats them as a misrepresentation usually but somehow not when it comes from some convoluted calculation that is obviously looking way too much into something that wasn't intended. Ideas?
Also, why aren't the comments on this site showing anymore? Did I miss an update?
Let's take the way Mario from Super Mario Galaxy is somehow a Galaxy-buster. Don't you find that a misrepresentation? Doesn't that go against Mario being one-shotted by Kamek? If not, then wouldn't that make Kamek a multi-galaxy buster? Then why wouldn't Bowser use Kamek to aid him in destroying galaxies and why wouldn't all the other Mario enemies be put at a similar level? Galaxy-buster Goomba anyone? And this is true for other series. If Megaman is a small planet buster wouldn't he simply obliterate Willy's castle without even needing to go inside? You see. Using calculations and powerscaling so loosely creates more confusion and outliers than not. This website seems to have a problem with outliers. It treats them as a misrepresentation usually but somehow not when it comes from some convoluted calculation that is obviously looking way too much into something that wasn't intended. Ideas?
Also, why aren't the comments on this site showing anymore? Did I miss an update?