Is this enough for qualitative superiority?

[Kubo423]

If X is already naturally Low 1-A, cannot be reached, and cannot descend to a lower state of existence, but Y, who is from a lower state of existence, can reach X with only X's help, and Y can only see X and cannot do anything to X, can this be considered up to 1-A?

 

[TheGatememer]

It would be supporting evidence of 1-A, but probably won't be 1-A by default. There needs to be evidence of a Qualitative Superiority for 1-A.

 

[Kubo423]

It would be supporting evidence of 1-A, but probably won't be 1-A by default. There needs to be evidence of a Qualitative Superiority for 1-A.

If X views a lower state of existence as a novel and Y can't do anything to X, but X can do everything to Y, doesn’t this fit better as 1-A rather than Low 1-A? The reason I ask is that X is naturally Low 1-A by default, but these reasons haven't yet been used to support it as 1-A.