- 1,064
- 2,447
Often, I'll see verses which have universes stated to be infinite multiple times, yet they have statements and depictions for a physical edge existing. My question is, what are the set standards regarding this?
In some threads, it devolves into philosophy of infinity and how something infinite having an edge could be logical.
In other threads, the supporters will usually try to resolve the edge contradictions.
I'm questioning how cases like this are evaluated. Is there a certain point where the number of infinite statements outweigh the number of edge statements? Are there instances where the arguments about infinity having an edge being logical work, and the contradictions are dismissed? Or should supporters always strive to resolve the contradictions?
In some threads, it devolves into philosophy of infinity and how something infinite having an edge could be logical.
In other threads, the supporters will usually try to resolve the edge contradictions.
I'm questioning how cases like this are evaluated. Is there a certain point where the number of infinite statements outweigh the number of edge statements? Are there instances where the arguments about infinity having an edge being logical work, and the contradictions are dismissed? Or should supporters always strive to resolve the contradictions?