Infinite^Infinite

[Hixkaryana]

I have 2-A structure which is found in an Infinite amount in another structure, I might look stupid but I'm unsure what tier that is.

 

[Digital_Franz]

I have 2-A structure which is found in an Infinite amount in another structure, I might look stupid but I'm unsure what tier that is.

Actually it is infinite*infinite=infinite because it is a 2-A structure which is infinite in number in another which always gives 2-A.

 

[Hixkaryana]

Actually it is infinite*infinite=infinite because it is a 2-A structure which is infinite in number in another which always gives 2-A.

Oh yeah I meant that idk why I wrote it as ^.. Thank you for your answer!

 

[Hixkaryana]

I also had another question, would a dimension which has an infinite amount of 4D universes embedded on it be granted HDE (5D) and Low 1-C ?

 

[Wikisource]

I have 2-A structure which is found in an Infinite amount in another structure, I might look stupid but I'm unsure what tier that is.

Tbh, the result of infinite^infinite depends on how you define infinite (on basic math or aleph number). But I don't think too much, Ig this could be Low 1-C iirc.

I also had another question, would a dimension which has an infinite amount of 4D universes embedded on it be granted HDE (5D) and Low 1-C ?

Yea.

 

[Hixkaryana]

Tbh, the result of infinite^infinite depends on how you define infinite (on basic math or aleph number). But I don't think too much, Ig this could be Low 1-C iirc..

I didn’t mean infinite^infinite I meant infinite*infinite which as stated is still infinite. But yeah I think I saw somewhere that inf^inf is Low 1-C.

Yea.

Thank you!

 

[Digital_Franz]

I also had another question, would a dimension which has an infinite amount of 4D universes embedded on it be granted HDE (5D) and Low 1-C ?

I don't think so, no.

 

[Hixkaryana]

I don't think so, no.

Oh..well there seems to be a conflict of ideas

 

[Digital_Franz]

Oh..well there seems to be a conflict of ideas

 

[Hixkaryana]

From the Q&A « A: One of the more straightforward ways to qualify for Tier 2 and up through higher dimensions is by affecting whole higher-dimensional universes which can embed the whole of lower-dimensional ones within themselves »
Do you dare disagree with thou sacred administrative authority?!

 

[Wikisource]

Oh..well there seems to be a conflict of ideas

Well...

 

[AigerTheKing]

I also had another question, would a dimension which has an infinite amount of 4D universes embedded on it be granted HDE (5D) and Low 1-C ?

no

 

[Hixkaryana]

no

Can you perhaps explain why

 

[AigerTheKing]

Can you perhaps explain why

Simple: no amount of 4D structures will ever be 5D

 

[Hixkaryana]

Simple: no amount of 4D structures will ever be 5D

Yeah but it’s kind of a special case here I suppose. The « 5D » one is already explicitly put as ontologically superior to all the 4D ones, it views them as infinitesimally small, has a different flow of time, it also totally controls the existence of all of them. Idk if that would change anything because to me it’s obvious it would be higher-dimensional.

 

[AigerTheKing]

Yeah but it’s kind of a special case here I suppose. The « 5D » one is already explicitly put as ontologically superior to all the 4D ones, it views them as infinitesimally small, has a different flow of time, it also totally controls the existence of all of them. Idk if that would change anything because to me it’s obvious it would be higher-dimensional.

You should check this part of the Tiering System FAQ about Larger 2-A Structures and see if it fits the requirements

 

[Hixkaryana]

You should check this part of the Tiering System FAQ about Larger 2-A Structures and see if it fits the requirements

Well since the embedded universes are STC’s they should be uncountably infinite If I’m not mistaken.