- 789
- 240
I have 2-A structure which is found in an Infinite amount in another structure, I might look stupid but I'm unsure what tier that is.
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Infinite^Infinite
- Thread starter Hixkaryana
- Start date
Digital_Franz
He/Him- 2,254
- 1,423
Actually it is infinite*infinite=infinite because it is a 2-A structure which is infinite in number in another which always gives 2-A.
- 789
- 240
- Thread starter
- #3
Oh yeah I meant that idk why I wrote it as ^.. Thank you for your answer!
- 789
- 240
- Thread starter
- #4
I also had another question, would a dimension which has an infinite amount of 4D universes embedded on it be granted HDE (5D) and Low 1-C ?
Wikisource
He/Him- 1,073
- 316
Tbh, the result of infinite^infinite depends on how you define infinite (on basic math or aleph number). But I don't think too much, Ig this could be Low 1-C iirc.
Yea.
- 789
- 240
- Thread starter
- #6
I didn’t mean infinite^infinite I meant infinite*infinite which as stated is still infinite. But yeah I think I saw somewhere that inf^inf is Low 1-C.
Thank you!
Digital_Franz
He/Him- 2,254
- 1,423
I don't think so, no.
- 789
- 240
- Thread starter
- #8
Oh..well there seems to be a conflict of ideas
Digital_Franz
He/Him- 2,254
- 1,423
https://cdn.**********.com/emojis/1032317700250284043.webp?size=128Oh..well there seems to be a conflict of ideas
- 789
- 240
- Thread starter
- #10
From the Q&A « A: One of the more straightforward ways to qualify for Tier 2 and up through higher dimensions is by affecting whole higher-dimensional universes which can embed the whole of lower-dimensional ones within themselves »
Do you dare disagree with thou sacred administrative authority?!
Wikisource
He/Him- 1,073
- 316
Well...Oh..well there seems to be a conflict of ideas
- 1,549
- 591
- 789
- 240
- Thread starter
- #13
Can you perhaps explain why
- 1,549
- 591
Simple: no amount of 4D structures will ever be 5D
- 789
- 240
- Thread starter
- #15
Yeah but it’s kind of a special case here I suppose. The « 5D » one is already explicitly put as ontologically superior to all the 4D ones, it views them as infinitesimally small, has a different flow of time, it also totally controls the existence of all of them. Idk if that would change anything because to me it’s obvious it would be higher-dimensional.
- 1,549
- 591
You should check this part of the Tiering System FAQ about Larger 2-A Structures and see if it fits the requirements
- 789
- 240
- Thread starter
- #17
Well since the embedded universes are STC’s they should be uncountably infinite If I’m not mistaken.
- 789
- 240
- Thread starter
- #18
Bump for clarity
- 3,487
- 4,578
I don't think it works like this. Be it a finite amount or infinite amount of universes they exist in that "imaginary 5D space", they need to exist in such a "5D" space to simultaneously exist and not superimpose themselves on one another.
I'd say you would need the verse to acknowledge the "higher dimensional space" for it to work.
- 789
- 240
- Thread starter
- #20
The whole verse revolves around that dimension being higher than the infinite lower ones.
- 3,487
- 4,578
Sends the scan
- 3,487
- 4,578
Also, seems like I have a few problems with some of the things in the sandbox, but I'm not knowledgeable in the verse, so I'll just assume I'm wrong.
Regarding the question, I suppose Low 1-C could perhaps work, I guess. Personally, I feel like a bit more would be better.
- 789
- 240
- Thread starter
- #24
Thank you for the recommandation, if you have any others feel free to share them!
A bit more as in what? Bit more proof?
- 3,487
- 4,578
Yeah, like, I understand where you're coming from, but personally, I'd say it would need a little more elaboration. You said the sandbox was incomplete, so perhaps there is more stuff about the entity to add.
Maybe I'm just too strict with how stuff are portrayed and maybe what is on the sandbox is enough for staff, but more evidence, the better.
- 789
- 240
- Thread starter
- #26
Oh yeah definitely, I started getting into it only a few days ago so I still need to thoroughly inspect every source of info I have. I just wanted to establish the aimed tier for what I already had.
Similar threads
