-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
I think Aristotle created his crazy transduality type 3.
- Thread starter Lewis
- Start date
- 709
- 189
- Thread starter
- #2
Trivialism - Wikipedia
- 9
- 4
trivialism and transduality type 3 challenge traditional binary logic, they do so in different ways. trivialism does not fit into the definition of transduality type 3 because it doesn't posit a state beyond truth and falsity, but rather, it posits that all contradictions are simultaneously true.
- 709
- 189
- Thread starter
- #4
Why does SRE have td3 for proving that every statement is true?
- 709
- 189
- Thread starter
- #5
I think it's Td3 that doesn't rely qualitatively beyond the duality system because it can set its state to true where the state is in all contradictions. This is 5 truth state in addition to the 4 truth states that the wiki cites for example. based on many valued logic
Similar threads
