Hax potency question

[Delta333]

I have been told by someone in glass realm that if you can affect infinite amount of something then your hax will be infinitely above baseline in case you can focus the hax on just one target?

Is this correct or not? If yes then how?

 

[Sniper670]

No. That's just range

 

[Delta333]

bump

 

[Dust_Collector]

Yeah I think we stopped using number of people affected as a way to judge the potency of hax a few months ago and just treat it as range now.

 

[Theglassman12]

If you’re capable of bypassing the resistances of a large number of characters then channel the hax to be more potent against an individual, it should be stronger by default.

 

[Delta333]

If you’re capable of bypassing the resistances of a large number of characters then channel the hax to be more potent against an individual, it should be stronger by default.

I know but affecting infinite number of targets doesn't translate to infinite baseline

 

[Theglassman12]

that's not the point I'm making, affecting an infinite number of beings naturally immune to the hax casually, and focusing on the hax to affect one person to make it superior would make it stronger.

 

[Antoniofer]

Sacrificing AoE for potency may be a thing (or vice-verse), although if the mindhax cover a certain area where it affected hundred of people, and then decides it tofocusing it into a single individual, that does not necessary mean the potency increased by hundreds of times; we generally can't determinate the potency in these cases beyond "is more powerful than before".

 

[Vietthai96]

depend, if the verse stated about hax potency/power tied to the amount of affected target or something similar then yeah you can translate the amount of target into potency. By default we don't treat that anymore, just range

 

[DaimaouAshura]

Makes sense to think of it as range, a grenade would kill targets the same way a bigger bomb would, were they inside area of effect. But I can see how quotes about putting all the weight o power meant for so many against one could change that.

 

[OnsokunoSonic]

Depend on context, as usual.

 

[Delta333]

I mean if there are no further contexts, of course

 

[OnsokunoSonic]

Then I don't think affecting infinite things and then focusing on one target can increase your potency.

 

[Dereck03]

I think it is more than obvious that it is only range.

 

[Delta333]

Yea I also think like that but I was in discussion with Glass and he kept saying otherwise smh

 

[OnsokunoSonic]

Weird.

 

[Vietthai96]

Then I don't think affecting infinite things and then focusing on one target can increase your potency.

If the verse itself directly stated this then no reason to deny it though

 

[Delta333]

If the verse directly said it then I don't even make this thread

 

[OnsokunoSonic]

If the verse itself directly stated this then no reason to deny it though

Okay and.

 

[Vietthai96]

Okay and?

And we done.......^^

 

[OnsokunoSonic]

Okay then.

 

[Theglassman12]

So is this thread done?

 

[Dereck03]

I think so yeah.

 

[Theglassman12]

Alright, I’ll be closing it.