• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

(Halo) Covenant/Promethean Weapons Atomize?

3,757
322
I was wondering, For those who have the information, was there any information on Covenant Weapons or Promethean Weapons that can atomize one's enemy? If so, why are the calcs here have the vaporization value?
 
They do not atomize; forerunner weapons do ionize which is heating up gas until it becomes plasma; which would be after vaporization. But it's still not even close to atomization. As for Covenant Weapons, the combined might 2 Fuel Rod Cannons did vaporize a small Spartan-III wearing SPI Armor, but nothing is close to atomization.
 
They do not atomize; forerunner weapons do ionize which is heating up gas until it becomes plasma; which would be after vaporization. But it's still not even close to atomization. As for Covenant Weapons, the combined might 2 Fuel Rod Cannons did vaporize a small Spartan-III wearing SPI Armor, but nothing is close to atomization.
Okay, Thanks, I figured as much
 
Actually, there is something about Binary Rifles firing antimatter jackets, never really quite got the difference there (at least for this site) as to why that wouldn’t be a qualifying factor for atomization or sub-atomic value since it would annihilate matter into energy or for the disintegration effect.
 
Having "Anti-matter jackets" is not good enough evidence. Anti-matter just deletes matter, which really isn't the same as atomization. Also, it cannot be assumed how much of the Binary Rifles are anti-matter; it just says there are some anti-matter particles in the hardlight bullets. But it's not really enough to really make an atomization calculation based off of it.
 
Having "Anti-matter jackets" is not good enough evidence. Anti-matter just deletes matter, which really isn't the same as atomization. Also, it cannot be assumed how much of the Binary Rifles are anti-matter; it just says there are some anti-matter particles in the hardlight bullets. But it's not really enough to really make an atomization calculation based off of it.
Okay, thanks for the clarification. So it would be more like ignoring durability feat?
 
Actually, there is something about Binary Rifles firing antimatter jackets, never really quite got the difference there (at least for this site) as to why that wouldn’t be a qualifying factor for atomization or sub-atomic value since it would annihilate matter into energy or for the disintegration effect.
Actually according to Halo wiki, it is called ionized particle apparently.
 
Back
Top