• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

SeijiSetto

VS Battles
Calculation Group
2,080
1,751
Hi.

All the 8-A characters should be downgraded to 8-B [40 Tons]. I re-calc'd Mori's Dragon Catcher and so everyone that scaled to it needs to get dropped down.

Very simple, very easy.

Time for Mori to shitstomp most of the MHA cast's early keys!

Agree: 2 (@PhantomØ4, @ImmortalDread)
Neutral: 0
Disagree: 0
 
Last edited:
Well if that's the feat everyone is scaling to then I guess it's ok. Calc is evaluated but I'll wait to see if there are any objections.
 
Applying the changes to the original would still give 8-A results for 8x and not 8x, with the only difference being this one measuring it horizontally and the original one measuring the crater vertically. So I guess the question is would this one(Horizontal measuring) be better to use or just use the old one(Vertically) with updated heights.

Both are fine to me.
 
Applying the changes to the original would still give 8-A results for 8x and not 8x, with the only difference being this one measuring it horizontally and the original one measuring the crater vertically. So I guess the question is would this one(Horizontal measuring) be better to use or just use the old one(Vertically) with updated heights.

Both are fine to me.
The issue wasn't measuring horizontal or vertical across the hole, both measurements give roughly the same value (530-ish px) in my higher-quality picture.

The issue was that the original calc did not pixel-scale Jegal (the dude laying on the floor) properly, and so it ended up being a far larger hole than it actually was due to the fact that his height was used as a measuring stick.

Just look at it relatively: They measured Jegal at 18px and the hole at 400px, about 22x. I measured Jegal at 33px and the hole at 530px, about 16x. The size was inflated because they didn't measure their ruler (Jegal) properly.
 
Last edited:
It's an accepted recalculation, seems fine to me.
 
Back
Top