• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Fragmentation or Violent Fragmentation?

864
564
For this feat, should normal Fragmentation or Violent Fragmentation be used?


Fragmentation: Applied when the matter that was destroyed was turned into fairly large and distinguishable pieces.

Violent Fragmentation: Applied when the matter that was destroyed was turned into small but still distinguishable pieces.
 
Can you add the scans of the full feat? As in, can you add the context behind the feat as a whole? That should give us an idea of which end to go for.
 
Can you add the scans of the full feat? As in, can you add the context behind the feat as a whole? That should give us an idea of which end to go for.
Kombu Infinity a Tiger Level monster in OPM survives an attack by Saitama who managed to destroy that part of the building. The fight between the two officially lasted 1 second.


In the anime it looks like this:
 
Hmmmmmm, the fragments look rather large compared to the original structure, I'd suggest going with normal frag of reinforced concrete, since well, buildings are made of concrete and rebar and stuff.
 
On the topic, can this be considered pulverization? Like, look, most of the stones are gone. I assumed "95% pulverization and 5% fragmentation".
 
On the topic, can this be considered pulverization? Like, look, most of the stones are gone. I assumed "95% pulverization and 5% fragmentation".
No, because when the dude was getting cratered we can clearly see large cube-like fragments being tossed around in the second scan.
 
That's too few fragmentes for a crater with ~229862145469cm^3. Just being normal fragmentation is strange

Anyway, alright
 
Back
Top