Fnaf at freddys discussion thread!

[Breadbear83]

Soo I just realized Afton is wearing the suit, that adds on extra weightl, and he would need to overcome inertia+gravity to even do so.

Might lowk also be an Class 10 LS Feat if someone accepts it. Unless I'm a huge moron and I'm crazy wrong

If the suit weighted more than 542 kg (superhuman LS, and without afton weight), then it would count, as that's what KE rule says, and as separate to his body it would count for LS, similarly to carrying heavy objects while running

But that suit clearly doesn't weight that much

 

[Comiphorous]

But that suit clearly doesn't weight that much

How wouldn't it weigh that much? Afton is wearing a whole animatronic around his body.

 

[Breadbear83]

How wouldn't it weigh that much? Afton is wearing a whole animatronic around his body.

Springlocks are meant to be wear by any adult, which not only means they can't be that heavy but also they being pretty hollow

 

[Comiphorous]

Springlocks are meant to be wear by any adult, which not only means they can't be that heavy but also they being pretty hollow

And what do those springlocks hold back?

 

[Breadbear83]

And what do those springlocks hold back?

Sorry, English isn't my first language and I couldn't see even with a translator what does "hold back" means in your sentence

For FNAF, circus baby it's stated to be 585lb (265.59kg), not even half for superhuman LS and she's 7ft tall

For real life, Walt Disney animatronic weights 2000lb (908kg) but also is 9ft tall: "9-foot-tall"
https://www.ocregister.com/2025/10/...foot-tall,-Frankenstein’s monster animatronic

Dunno how to calc the suits weight but it hardly would get into that many hundreds of kg

 

[Comiphorous]

Sorry, English isn't my first language and I couldn't see even with a translator what does "hold back" means in your sentence

Springlock suits double as an animatronic and a suit. The springlocks when in suit mode are holding the animatronic mechanisms to the sides of the suit so that a person can fit when they're wearing it. Afton when he's in the suit is running around with those bits of machinery still in the suit. He at bare minimum has to weigh the same as a regular animatronic, plus all the mechanisms so it can switch between the two modes.

 

[OiEuSouDuvi]

https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/User_blog:Monstermadman/FNaF_Novel_Trilogy:_Afton_blitzes_a_trained_officer

Superhuman to Subsonic calc for the novel trilogy

I think it's a good idea to check the scene in the original novel, since it might be simplified.

 

[Katipax]

Soo I just realized Afton is wearing the suit, that adds on extra weightl, and he would need to overcome inertia+gravity to even do so.

Might lowk also be an Class 10 LS Feat if someone accepts it. Unless I'm a huge moron and I'm crazy wrong

Using Novel context, Officer Dunn actually walks up to Afton , then Afton collapses onto Officer Dunn to which he then kills him. Meaning that whayever was depicted in the graphic novel is inaccurate

 

[Perequeliri993]

Using Novel context, Officer Dunn actually walks up to Afton , then Afton collapses onto Officer Dunn to which he then kills him. Meaning that whayever was depicted in the graphic novel is inaccurate

It may be inaccurate to the novel, but I believe we can still use the feat. Since the differences between the classic and graphic novels are minor enough they, for lack of a better word, count as "Composite", the same story.

 

[Monstermadman]

It may be inaccurate to the novel, but I believe we can still use the feat. Since the differences between the classic and graphic novels are minor enough they, for lack of a better word, count as "Composite", the same story.

Alright, that's good.

Considering that this is Human Afton, should the animatronics [main 4, Twisted Freddy, and Springtrap] upscale to baseline Subsonic should the feat be accepted? It's less than a 3% difference afterall so any meaningful difference would be in the Subsonic range

 

[Monstermadman]

Made a profile for Twisted Wolf

Any thoughts? Or is it good to go?

 

[OiEuSouDuvi]

It may be inaccurate to the novel, but I believe we can still use the feat. Since the differences between the classic and graphic novels are minor enough they, for lack of a better word, count as "Composite", the same story.

In fact, the Charlie Trilogy graphic novels often condenses and simplifies interactions and descriptions from the original novels; while it is valid as a visual representation, it makes no sense to use it if it contradicts the original novel.

 

[OiEuSouDuvi]

Using Novel context, Officer Dunn actually walks up to Afton , then Afton collapses onto Officer Dunn to which he then kills him. Meaning that whayever was depicted in the graphic novel is inaccurate

Do you have the scan?

 

[Monstermadman]

Made a profile for Twisted Wolf

Any thoughts? Or is it good to go?

Posted it, officially up on the official FNAF verse page now

 

[Perequeliri993]

In fact, the Charlie Trilogy graphic novels often condenses and simplifies interactions and descriptions from the original novels; while it is valid as a visual representation, it makes no sense to use it if it contradicts the original novel.

It's the same story, just some parts either shortened or simplified for representation's sake. It makes no sense to create another whole different page what's bassically the same character with slightly different feats coming from simple change of media. I believe in cases like this it's alright to simply merge them, although I do confess that I have to re-read the specific rules in the aproppiate pages to make sure.

 

[Perequeliri993]

"When different source materials give different versions of the same feat, and by that they contradict each other in the depiction of the feat, the primary canon takes precedence over the secondary canon."

I have said nothing and you have not read the above

 

[Monstermadman]

"When different source materials give different versions of the same feat, and by that they contradict each other in the depiction of the feat, the primary canon takes precedence over the secondary canon."

I have said nothing and you have not read the above

Are we seriously gonna have to separate the graphic novels from their regular novel counterparts?

 

[Perequeliri993]

Are we seriously gonna have to separate the graphic novels from their regular novel counterparts?

From what I can read in the canon page, we can't make a graphic novel page at all. The graphic novel counts as secondary canon for the novel's primary canon (which in of itself is an alternative canon). We can use scans that line up with what primary canon tells, but not with what it contradicts.

I actually reccomend you read the 'canon' page, it's easy to understand what is there as written.

This is also why, for example, you don't normally see anime versions of characters. What lines up is accepted, what doesn't is disregarded, unless the story is different enough it counts as an alternate canon outright.

 

[Monstermadman]

From what I can read in the canon page, we can't make a graphic novel page at all. The graphic novel counts as secondary canon for the novel's primary canon (which in of itself is an alternative canon). We can use scans that line up with what primary canon tells, but not with what it contradicts.

I actually reccomend you read the 'canon' page, it's easy to understand what is there as written.

This is also why, for example, you don't normally see anime versions of characters. What lines up is accepted, what doesn't is disregarded, unless the story is different enough it counts as an alternate canon outright.

so we cant use this feat, a dang shame but thats ok