Durability upgrade for Composite Tree

[LordWhis]

https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/User_blog:TataHakai/Destroying_Pando

 

[Saikou_The_Lewd_King]

No. We already downgraded the tree from a similar calc.

 

[LordWhis]

No. We already downgraded the tree from a similar calc.

Why ?

 

[DMUA]

Because you don't need to blow it to a million pieces to kill or damage it.


It would be like having CH be building level.

 

[LordWhis]

Because you don't need to blow it to a million pieces to kill or damage it.


It would be like having CH be building level.

Pando is pretty durable, it has survived many fires & regenerated from its roots.

 

[Unimportantalt]

tbh the tree still should be upgraded. the redwoods extremely thick so maybe should be room level

http://i.imgur.com/DrdPoIv.jpg

 

[DMUA]

Well, that's still not durability, that's fire resistance and Regenerationn.

 

[LordWhis]

Because you don't need to blow it to a million pieces to kill or damage it.


It would be like having CH be building level.

Also, due to sheer size, an attack that is capable of killing it would have to be atleast 8-b

 

[Unimportantalt]

yeah you cant cut thru hyperion with an axe

 

[LordWhis]

Pando, is so big that for a single explosion to kill it, it would have to be 8-B.

 

[LordWhis]

Bump

 

[DMUA]

Bumps are more of a daily thing.

 

[LordWhis]

Bumps are more of a daily thing.

Sorry

 

[LordWhis]

Bump

 

[LordWhis]

Composite Tree is a composite of all real life trees, not fictional. Pando is fictional.

XDXDXDXDXDXDXDXDXDXDXDXD

Pando is very much real dude !

 

[LordWhis]

Bump

 

[Antoniofer]

The reason why the previous was rejected is cuz the durability of the tree depend of the wood of what is made, not the size/mass of the tree; what you calculated there is more like HP (not even that cuz cutting the tree at the half would count as being "killed"), it also has few mistake that I write in there.

 

[LordWhis]

The reason why the previous was rejected is cuz the durability of the tree depend of the wood of what is made, not the size/mass of the tree; what you calculated there is more like HP (not even that cuz cutting the tree at the half would count as being "killed"), it also has few mistake that I write in there.

But a weaker attack would not kill the tree due to its sheer size.

 

[Antoniofer]

Correction, a weaker attack wouldn't destroy the tree completely, but it still cause a considerable amount of damage.

 

[LordWhis]

Correction, a weaker attack wouldn't destroy the tree completely, but it still cause a considerable amount of damage.

Fine, but that would still result in 8-A durability.

 

[Antoniofer]

Problem is that would be misleading: you wouldn't need 8-A AP to cause moderate damage to the tree, is just that you would need 8-A AP to one-shot the tree (w/o AoE or AoE that cover at least the size of the tree). Someone with 9-A AP could destroy the tree over time.

 

[LordWhis]

Problem is that would be misleading: you wouldn't need 8-A AP to cause moderate damage to the tree, is just that you would need 8-A AP to one-shot the tree (w/o AoE or AoE that cover at least the size of the tree). Someone with 9-A AP could destroy the tree over time.

But durability is unfortunately classified on the basis of how much power is required to oneshot.

 

[Antoniofer]

Eh, no, otherwise most of normal humans would be 9-B in durability, and most of our profiles with supposting durability calcs would have the At least in them (the ones that weren't casual).