Does this qualify for R>F?

[LuisGeno]

Hello everyone.

I found these scans taken from Ghost Rider Kushala infinity. And he wanted to know if he qualified or not, for an R>F.



I hope it is correct to send the scans in this way. But hey, the scan says that one dimension is infinitely larger than a lower dimension. (explicitly says it's referring to dimensions, and not universes or anything) If I'm not mistaken, this counts as R>F, and I suppose it can be extended to all of Marvel's higher dimensions, as they explain that this R>F is by nature dimensional (the 3D-2D example).

Well, I just want to know if this is right or wrong. Greetings to all.

 

[LephyrTheRevanchist]

This is not R>F, but plain ol dimensional bs

 

[LuisGeno]

This is not R>F, but plain ol dimensional bs

I don't understand, can you explain it to me, please?

 

[LephyrTheRevanchist]

Reality>Fiction refers to transcendence of a fictional space. For example, you exist in a higher reality than, say, the comicbook world and their characters. They cannot perceive you, they cannot interact with you. At a minimum, we say that this is a higher dimensional transcendence, since we see the comicbook world express through a 2-dimensional medium, being the contents within the paper.

What these panels are discussing is not a difference between a fictional world and normal reality, but of straight spatial dimensions. These higher worlds perceive the lower worlds as 3-dimensional objects (for example a cube) perceive a 2-dimensional one (for example a square).

All of this is better explained in the pages I linked.

Edit: Basically, while they have similarities in applicability for our indexing, they aren't really the same. One deals with fictionalized mediums, the other with dimensionality.

 

[LuisGeno]

I understand, thank you very much for helping me.

 

[LephyrTheRevanchist]

I will be closing this now, then.