when an r>f gets disqualified

[Napoleondevious]

Lets say an r>f is asseted in a verse, and the verse has a disqualifier to make it outerversal, can we count the r>f as being at least a 1+ in dimension ? or possibly low outerversal ? or simply nothing (if the disqualifier doesnt disqualify +1D and low outer of course)

 

[Napoleondevious]

bump

 

[Accelerated_Evolution]

No

Either R>F is outer or there ins't any R>F at all

 

[Robo432343]

"Before writing this summary, I took the time to do some digging and found that some characters are currently accepted as holding a Reality-Fiction Transcendence over a reality due to some pieces of evidence that are rather underwhelming. These profiles, for instance, treat purely visual depictions of characters viewing reality as TV channels, or a film, as gameboards, as evidence of R>F.

As I've said before, I more or less completely reject the usage of such things as primary evidence for a Reality-Fiction Transcendence. Those would be relegated to being supplementary evidence, at best, but alone would never suffice."

 

[Ezaru]

No

Either R>F is outer or there ins't any R>F at all

Really?

So we don't equate any level of transcendence to an uncountably infinite gap?

 

[Grabbing_dragon]

we count the r>f as being at least a 1+ in dimension ?

It turns into that,so Yeah

 

[Berga14]

Lets say an r>f is asseted in a verse, and the verse has a disqualifier to make it outerversal, can we count the r>f as being at least a 1+ in dimension ? or possibly low outerversal ? or simply nothing (if the disqualifier doesnt disqualify +1D and low outer of course)

Depends on context, like Magi has infinite R>f with discualifiers. The cosmology is still H1b

 

[Astral_Trinity439]

Lets say an r>f is asseted in a verse, and the verse has a disqualifier to make it outerversal, can we count the r>f as being at least a 1+ in dimension ?

Depends on context, but mostly yes.

or possibly low outerversal ?

Depends on context

or simply nothing (if the disqualifier doesnt disqualify +1D and low outer of course)

If the disqualifier doesn't entail an anti-feat for +1D or Low 1-A as well, then those ratings can be considered as long as there's enough context.