Does a cosmology that has a universal+ space which contains an object that houses a uni+ pocket dimension grants you Low 1-C?

[Johner2133451]

Since a low 2-C space contains uncountably infinite snapshots of the same universe and each of those snapshots has their own object that houses a uni+/4D spacetime pocket dimension

 

[Johner2133451]

bump

 

[Berga14]

bump

I'm not to good at this but here is what i would have done to get a l1C scaling:

1) explain the nature of the pocket dimension and scale it to low 2C

2) bring proof of the main time axis containing the entirety of the pocket dimension
(So not like a character creating a pocket dimension in a space parallel to the main spacetime).

3) showing how times flows within the pocked dim. while the main time doesn't. or something like that, normally timetravell is used to show perpendicularity but idk how it will works in this case.

But frankly i think that a pocket dimension will not have any inpact on the cosmology at all by just the fact that it is a pocket dimension. I think yoy should get an imput from a staff or from someone that knows more than me.

 

[Napoleondevious]

Since a low 2-C space contains uncountably infinite snapshots of the same universe and each of those snapshots has their own object that houses a uni+/4D spacetime pocket dimension

no, because each one of these snapshot isnt necesserly uni+ in size, since all of time needs to be compressed in space for it to make sense( or hypertimeline) also this is a pocket dimension so it is likely outside of the main universe, but also because this spacetime's timeline isnt necesserly perpendicular to the higher timeline (in short, the higher timeline's snapshot dont necesserly correspond to a version of this house entirely, just an infinitesimal snapshot being the physical spatial part of this house)

so no its not low 1C on its own, thats uni+ to possibly 2-C (cuz 2 timelines, even tho the house timeline is for a very small volume being a house, idk if the wiki's standard allow it to scale to uni+)

 

[OrangeFR]

That’s just 2-C

 

[Theglassman12]

That’s not how higher dimensional timelines work. That’s just an object holding a separate reality, which would at best be 2-C

 

[Johner2133451]

That’s not how higher dimensional timelines work. That’s just an object holding a separate reality, which would at best be 2-C

So what happens if the object were to be duplicated, their pocket dimensions are also duplicated?

 

[Theglassman12]

If the realms duplicate it wouldn’t be tier 1, still tier 2

 

[Johner2133451]

If the realms duplicate it wouldn’t be tier 1, still tier 2

Even if it's uncountable infinite? Alright thanks

 

[Vietthai96]

Well, mathematically speaking, yeah, if you multiplying uni+ object uncountable infinitely, then it is Low 1-C

Generally speaking simply an uni+ structure housing an uni+ structure in it can be Low 1-C, but that require evidence

 

[Johner2133451]

Well, mathematically speaking, yeah, if you multiplying uni+ object uncountable infinitely, then it is Low 1-C

Generally speaking simply an uni+ structure housing an uni+ structure in it can be Low 1-C, but that require evidence

What kind of evidence?

 

[Vietthai96]

What kind of evidence?

That is a hard question, ngl

 

[Napoleondevious]

3) showing how times flows within the pocked dim. while the main time doesn't. or something like that, normally timetravell is used to show perpendicularity but idk how it will works in this case.

1) the lower spacetime being fully encompassed within the space of the higher timeline, so that at each instant of the higher timeline is assigned a spacetime (so R × R⁴), Low 1-C

2) the highest timeline time traveling allows access to alternate version of the lower one, just like interdimensional travel but with timelines, usually done by solving paradoxes or going in previous version of this timeline (when it wasnt destroyed for exemple)