• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Deletion of Santa Claus profile

Status
Not open for further replies.

Faisal_Shourov

VS Battles
Retired
2,773
126
The Santa Claus profile was initially assumed to be a joke profile by me, but I came to know it's actually based on the lore. The problem is, the profile doesn't follow wiki format, nor there's any reference to his stats. The stats have changed several times since the page was created, jumping from tier 10 to tier 2. No explanation for stat change was given. Thus, everything on the profile appears to be baseless assumption.

Because of having arbitrary stats and absolutely no explanation for stat change and reference, I suggest the profile to be deleted. A new one can be made if any reference to his power is available.

Santa Claus
 
Well, it does have several references to why he has the statistics that he has, and I find the profile rather charming myself. It would help with links to the calculations that it seems to be based on though.
 
If I ever find the time, I'll check up on those, perhaps write a blog. Rather bogged down by school and other miscellaneous responsibilities currently, though, and have sporadic computer access. The only thing that I find possibly suspect is Small Planetary durability for withstanding... G-Force? Maybe ask the person who added that statistic?
 
Antvasima said:
Well, it does have several references to why he has the statistics that he has, and I find the profile rather charming myself. It would help with links to the calculations that it seems to be based on though.
By references I mean actual links, not just explanation. His tier was changed from 2 to 10 over time, which lead me to believe everything on the profile is baseless speculation. Also under his attack potency, it says

Unquantifiable, as Santa never enters combat and has never demonstrated any destructive feats through recorded history, possibly Large Country level (If we assume that Santa's arm movement in lifting the sack can be utilized in punching an object)

This is extremely poor quality writing, do we even use unquantifiable? Also what does Tier N/A mean? We used to have this tire back when Joke profiles were allowed. Also for Large Country level, it says Santa's arm movement in lifting sack can be utilized in punching an object. What does that mea
 
"His tier was changed from 2 to 10 over time, which lead me to believe everything on the profile is baseless speculation."

People arguing over something's legitimacy does not "baseless speculation" make. By that logic, many popular anime characters' statistics would be "pointless speculation", as people have argued that the likes of, say, Goku are as low as Multi-Planet or as high as Multiversal.

"Unquantifiable, as Santa never enters combat and has never demonstrated any destructive feats through recorded history, possibly Large Country level (If we assume that Santa's arm movement in lifting the sack can be utilized in punching an object)

This is extremely poor quality writing, do we even use unquantifiable? Also what does Tier N/A mean? We used to have this tire back when Joke profiles were allowed. Also for Large Country level, it says Santa's arm movement in lifting sack can be utilized in punching an object. What does that mean"

This, on the other hand, is a perfectly legitimate concern. It should probably be rewritten, and instances of N/A or Unquantifiable replaced with Unknown. I wouldn't really call it a "joke profile" though, strictly speaking, it does seriously analyze the character in question.
 
^The writings of the profile made me suspect it's a joke profile, I have nothing against it. But I want to see better justification for stats. If there's none, we can delete it until we get something better
 
Lifting Strength does not always equate to striking strength/attack potency unless work is being done. A M+ character can be wall level. This should be removed.
 
Well given the fact that he travels with this entire weight with him at Relat+ speed, wouldn't that be KE on its own? Or is this considered calc stacking?
 
Santa is more like mythology than Real Life, unless we somehow tries to hide the fact that Santa isn't real.
 
Saikou The Lewd King said:
Santa is more like mythology than Real Life, unless we somehow tries to hide the fact that Santa isn't real.
We don't have any problems with mythological profiles, the format and the rationale behind the stats are the issues...
 
ThePerpetual I have asked Raven to do calc if he can, and yes you can have your time. But if it doesn't get fixed it should be deleted

Sorry for the bold words, it happened after I copied your name
 
Okay then. I would prefer if the profile can be fixed rather than deleted, but yes, the "Real Life" category should be replaced with "Mythology".
 
Well, I suppose that I have to delete it then. Too bad. I rather liked it.
 
I can find a value for this stuff if you give me time, guys, I'd rather not rebuild an entire profile from scratch.
 
Hmm. I already deleted it, but I suppose that I can restore it if you wish to make an attempt to rescue it.
 
well i found an article, and using their mass and speed it comes out as like High 7-A from KE of the sleigh

should i show you the details?
 
the article


speed = 4.427*10^6 m/s = roughly 1.4757 percent the speed of light (High MHS+) {I used ther data and re-did the speed, since their speed seemed to be a little flawed)


mass of sleigh (relativity taken into account)= 2,363,457.358 tonns


KE = (0.5)(speed^2)(mass) = 2.316*10^22 J = 5.535 tetratons of TNT = Small country level +

I changed the overall speed, and got a different result AND the last time i didnt read that the mass was in tonnes


so overall, the estimations may vary, but the results will be in the small country to low end country level range

in this case, at high end of small country level, so i think Low 6-B can be appropriate with sub relativistic speed
 
So Sub-Rel and Small Country. Can you put these calculations in a blog or something similar, so that they can be linked to?
 
ok i will make one IF people here agree with it now


i mean it wud be foolish to make a blog for formal records and end up having it disputed out of existance


in short: is everyone OKAY with Low 6-B and sub relativistic santa? if so i will make a profper blog about it
 
sorry, just one more thing, the speed is less than i calced, they calced it ok in the first article, but they worded it worng int he second one, result is still like low 6-B though
 
Thank you TLT1 for your calc, this thread is no longer necessary since everything has been sorted out.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top