• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Deepwoken CM 3 Removal

Messages
14,997
Reaction score
10,334
The Player from Deepwoken has conceptual summoning type 3 based off this WoG discord statement:

QhvUzJo.png


We do not allow WoG statements like this unless it is backed up by actual statements from the game or lore

how did this even get accepted
 
We don't? Dang it, prob like 30% of the lore is revealed through discord statements because the devs don't seem to feel like adding them in game 💀

Ig i agree
 
The Player from Deepwoken has conceptual summoning type 3 based off this WoG discord statement:

QhvUzJo.png


We do not allow WoG statements like this unless it is backed up by actual statements from the game or lore

how did this even get accepted
Only if they care adding the word itself on the mantra card instead of being a discord statement(they forgot it so gg). for now i agree
 
Only if they care adding the word itself on the mantra card instead of being a discord statement(they forgot it so gg). for now i agree
so uh I rechecked the wiki(the mantra descriptions are 1:1 ingame) and see this. Might need a new ability instead of CM3 ngl.
 
We do not allow WoG statements like this unless it is backed up by actual statements from the game or lore
Where is that said? I'm pretty sure we only disregard WoGs if they specifically contradict canon or have been made as an answer to a leading question.
 
Back
Top