• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Concept: something is abstract, fundamental, and have feats/contexts prove it behaving like concept

Information: we have many words that can be use interchangable with information such as data, record, etc.......And if those thing is for knowledge it if Info type 1, if those thing is fundamental that shape reality or object, person it is Info type 2

Anyway it is extremely hard to explain in general way, we need contexts and feats to evaluate
 
Concept: something is abstract, fundamental, and have feats/contexts prove it behaving like concept

Information: we have many words that can be use interchangable with information such as data, record, etc.......And if those thing is for knowledge it if Info type 1, if those thing is fundamental that shape reality or object, person it is Info type 2

Anyway it is extremely hard to explain in general way, we need contexts and feats to evaluate
One argument that I often come across to prove something is that the concept is "ABC is the origin of XYZ", or another type of argument is "ABC makes XYZ". What makes me wonder is their reasonableness.
 
One argument that I often come across to prove something is that the concept is "ABC is the origin of XYZ", or another type of argument is "ABC makes XYZ". What makes me wonder is their reasonableness.
Nah, being the origin of something isn't mean it is concept, and it extremely depend on contexts, for example i say human is the origin of building, human obviously can't be concept. Same as fiction, in fiction we have many creator god who is the origin of their respective cosmology, yet they not neccessary to be concepts
 
Back
Top