Companies category guidelines

[IdiosyncraticLawyer]

Bump.

 

[Antvasima]

I think that the suggestion in Bobsican's last post in this thread seems fine to apply.

 

[IdiosyncraticLawyer]

I think that the suggestion in Bobsican's last post in this thread seems fine to apply.

Let's do it, then. What do I need to modify?

 

[Antvasima]

Presumably to modify the instruction text here:

Companies

vsbattles.fandom.com

Is that correct, @Bobsican?

 

[Bobsican]

Indeed, the issue now would be how to word such clarification there.

 

[Antvasima]

Yes. I would appreciate if somebody is willing to write a draft text that I can improve on the word flow of afterwards.

 

[IdiosyncraticLawyer]

Yes. I would appreciate if somebody is willing to write a draft text that I can improve on the word flow of afterwards.

How about this?

To ensure that company categories accurately reflect their ownership and involvement in the creation of fictional content, company categories are limited to works they genuinely own, rather than works they have only collaborated on or published.

 

[IdiosyncraticLawyer]

How about this?

@Antvasima

 

[IdiosyncraticLawyer]

@Antvasima

 

[IdiosyncraticLawyer]

@Antvasima Is this acceptable?

How about this?

To ensure that company categories accurately reflect their ownership and involvement in the creation of fictional content, company categories are limited to works they genuinely own, rather than works they have only collaborated on or published.

 

[Antvasima]

I think that seems fine to apply. Thank you very much for helping out.

 

[IdiosyncraticLawyer]

I think that seems fine to apply. Thank you very much for helping out.

Done. You can close this.

Companies

vsbattles.fandom.com