changing something?

[Artorimachi_Meteoraft]

so i had this thought a few days ago.

i mean you can change something into another thing (aka an orange into apple for example) but wouldn't it still be the same object? what sort of change would be needed to make sure it's not the same object anymore. (what i mean is even though you changed it. It's still the same object but with different properties and stuff)?

i also had another bugging me.

for some reason i have this thought of (it's similar to the above) when you change something. you changed it. but why do i feel like the original thing is still unchanged. (it's like making a bachelor a married bachelor but the definition of bachelor still remains the same) or you change something but you still want the original definition to be the same and yet simultaneously not.

also if you have the power to change the definitions (like change definition of orange to the definition of apple) then what's going to be the word for the original definition of apple) (similar to the above thing a bit)

sorry if you guys can't understand me. sometimes i think to much about things/the world and it bothers me. which is why i bring it up here.

 

[QuasiYuri]

Third one is conceptual Manipulation type 3
Second one too i think

First one sounds like Soft and Wet from JJBA

 

[Artorimachi_Meteoraft]

Third one is conceptual Manipulation type 3
Second one too i think

First one sounds like Soft and Wet from JJBA

3rd thing i actually meant orange not apple. original definition of orange.

Also not only do you have to change the original thing but you have to do the same for all times of the original thing. what i mean is original things entire existence.

you changed it but you also need to change the entire past of it. all the times of it's existence.

think of it's entire timeline like it was strips of film.

you changed it but you also didn't change the previous strips of it.

you changed the object in the present but you also didn't change the previous times. aka slides.

you need to change it from the moment it existed to the present it was changed.

 

[QuasiYuri]

still is conceptual manip

 

[Artorimachi_Meteoraft]

though quasi.

i feel like i had similar questions (i think i didn't give the exact question i wanted) (like exact wording and all that)

i also feel like the second question i brought up i wanted to add more to it but i don't want too.

is that okay.

 

[Artorimachi_Meteoraft]

although one thing i can tell you. (the others i can't because i probably might not say exactly what i want to say)

how can you do avoid doing something and doing nothing while not simultaneously doing both.

Some users can simultaneous do two things but how can you do this

Simultaneous do both nothing and something while not simultaneously (it doesn't make sense because if your simultaneously doing something and nothing while not simultaneously doing that, your still simultaneously doing something)

Which kind of people can do such a thing (excluding an omnipotent being of course)

 

[Artorimachi_Meteoraft]

how's that final questioN?