- 40,469
- 12,953
What tier is being responsible for the earth's revolution around the sun, as opposed to the sun itself and gravity? The sun is still there in this situation.
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Causing the earth's rEevolutionn
- Thread starter The_real_cal_howard
- Start date
- 15,436
- 7,857
I'm leaning towards planet level but I'll wait for more input.
- 15,418
- 5,748
The revolution of Earth around the sun is really just the planet's sheer speed.
A quick KE calc gave me a bit above Star level (7.401744915484759e+41) but I'm not sure if it's 100% accurate.
EDIT: Scratch that I'm utterly dumb, true Result is like Small Planet level (3.161068749e+33)
A quick KE calc gave me a bit above Star level (7.401744915484759e+41) but I'm not sure if it's 100% accurate.
EDIT: Scratch that I'm utterly dumb, true Result is like Small Planet level (3.161068749e+33)
- 15,332
- 7,563
The energy for the sun's total gravity and all that is probably close to Tier 4, as I said, but i'm not sure on the Earth's revolution in this scenario.
- 40,469
- 12,953
- Thread starter
- #5
As I told Kep earlier, this is for Xerneas' feat of doing just that. Just a heads up.
- 10,883
- 12,296
Causing it or keeping it going?
Causing it takes something 3*10^33 J.
Keeping it going is the kind of thing that is unintuitive, since it takes no energy at all.
Seems strange, but it is just as holding up something have would seem to require energy, since it is exhausting, but actually doesn't.
Heres some explanation from the same thread as the prior link .
I suppose for the purpose of ranking one could maybe adress the 3*10^33J to it. Not sure, though.
Causing it takes something 3*10^33 J.
Keeping it going is the kind of thing that is unintuitive, since it takes no energy at all.
Seems strange, but it is just as holding up something have would seem to require energy, since it is exhausting, but actually doesn't.
Heres some explanation from the same thread as the prior link .
I suppose for the purpose of ranking one could maybe adress the 3*10^33J to it. Not sure, though.
- 40,469
- 12,953
- Thread starter
- #7
Causing it. Thanks, DT.
- 15,418
- 5,748
See Cal. Now you downgraded the feat.
- 15,332
- 7,563
Nice job breaking it, hero.
Similar threads
