Busting Space VS Busting Space-Time

[ZeoParadox]

Well I have a few questions 1.)Is turning the universe into a void of nothingness considering busting all the space or just all of the matter? 2.)Since time flows in space, if you busted all the space in the universe would that also be busting time(Space-Time). 3.)What would either of those feats be listed as using the tiering system?

Can someone please go into detail with explanations?

 

[Reppuzan]

1) Depends on how far "nothingness" goes. If nothingness is defined as "there's nothing left in the universe" as in nothing but blank space, then it's 3-A since it's still limited to a 3-D level. However, if nothingness is defined as "there's nothing left", as in there is absolutely, positively nothing left, then it's a Low 2-C feat since the concepts of time and space have been erased.

2) Space is considered part of the third dimension, so unless time is destroyed as well, it would still be a 3-D feat since time would still be present to the best of my knowledge (i.e. if space were destroyed in the future, time would still be flowing in the present and past).

 

[ZeoParadox]

1) Depends on how far "nothingness" goes. If nothingness is defined as "there's nothing left in the universe" as in nothing but blank space, then it's 3-A since it's still limited to a 3-D level. However, if nothingness is defined as "there's nothing left", as in there is absolutely, positively nothing left, then it's a Low 2-C feat since the concepts of time and space have been erased.

2) Space is considered part of the third dimension, so unless time is destroyed as well, it would still be a 3-D feat since time would still be present to the best of my knowledge (i.e. if space were destroyed in the future, time would still be flowing in the present and past).

Alright thanks