Ben 10: Small revision

[Reiner04]

Note 2: Ben using Alien X's DNA to cut through the Contumelia's Extra-Dimensional Barrier is unquantifiable. While the Contumelia Ship was undamaged by the Annihilargh's Big Bang, it has been damaged by far less such as Grey Matter breaking one of it's metal pipes and the combined Time Cycles being able to break through it. On another note, the ship's weaponry is no more than a threat to Ben's regular Aliens.

Alien X

Alien X is the Omnitrix's DNA sample of a Celestialsapien from the Forge of Creation. Tier: 2-A, possibly 1-B Name: Alien X, his personalities include Serena, Bellicus, and Ben Tennyson Origin: Ben 10 Gender: Male Age: Inapplicable (Was born in a realm that is out of sync with time, existed...

vsbattles.fandom.com

This note on Alien X profile is based off Reasons that do not suffice or justify the following result it's claiming about Extra-Dimensional barrier.

1. Grey matter damaged the inside space ship stuff such as it's "water pipe", there is no reason that it's "water pipe" will scale and be as durable as it's exo body unless we start scaling wires and other stuff inside machines on same level as of entire outer/exo body which in this case of ship was what exactly who tanked the annhilargh not inside wires whatsoever.
2. Ben's time cycle was able to dent a hole in contamelias exo body, that really doesn't discredit it's durability to tank annhilargh anyway when we already know that energy with which time cycle was moving is unquantifiable, we simply don't know how much K.E it had, it had enough power to cross the timestream. In addition Time cycle had enough power to tore the fabric of existence itself. Just because it's range of is far smaller than annhilargh, doesn't mean it's area of effect would be.
3. It's weapons were no more than a regular threat to Ben's aliens. First of all, they weren't weapons, they were simply Strings that were supposed to Attach earth to the ship. That's all and even when ignoring it, why would weapons of the ship will scale to durability of the exo body of the ship anyway? Exo body of the ship already has tanked the most powerful device on that ship, which was Annhilargh.

In all, if these were the reasons for the note, then yeet it off. Nothing proves that exo body in anyway cannot scale to annhilargh when it already had tanked it's explosion.

Agree: @Firestorm808 , @KLOL506 , @Eficiente, @Aachintya31 , @LuffyRuffy46307 , @omegabronic , @BlackDarkness679

 

[Aachintya31]

another Reiner W

 

[Quantu]

Neutral for now, waiting for a potential opposing side

 

[KLOL506]

The arguments seem to make sense at a glance, but I will wait for what the others have to say about this.

@Firestorm808 Would you be able to assist?

 

[LuffyRuffy46307]

agree for the time being, the other person will present arguments against.

 

[BlackDarkness679]

Makes a lot of sense the points

 

[omegabronic]

agreed

 

[ProfessorKukui4Life]

Link the original thread where it was decided for this note to be added please.

So the original arguments for the note in the first place can be seen

 

[Firestorm808]

The arguments seem to make sense at a glance, but I will wait for what the others have to say about this.

@Firestorm808 Would you be able to assist?

I have no immediate issues with the reasonings. Yes, the supposed weapons were actually just anchors to tie the ship down to the planet via tractor beams.

 

[Reiner04]

If anybody have any concern with the revision. It'll be appreciated if they speak of that. The note and scans regarding the note with reasons are present in the profiles.

 

[LuffyRuffy46307]

If anybody have any concern with the revision. It'll be appreciated if they speak of that. The note and scans regarding the note with reasons are present in the profiles.

Will feedback be updated for 1-C as well?

 

[Reiner04]

Will feedback be updated for 1-C as well?

This is not a thread for that.

 

[ProfessorKukui4Life]

Link the original thread where it was decided for this note to be added please.

So the original arguments for the note in the first place can be seen

 

[Reiner04]

Link the original thread where it was decided for this note to be added please.

So the original arguments for the note in the first place can be seen

I don't know where it was accepted, the reasoning in the profile is what matters and that's not enough to claim such. So unless there is new something to add on, it'll be removed.

 

[Eficiente]

Even going along everything here, this wouldn't be a 2-A feat as the ship would take a present moment of the blast whereas what's 2-A about it is the whole thing everywhere and in all points in time. It would be High 3-A.

 

[omegabronic]

Even going along everything here, this wouldn't be a 2-A feat as the ship would take a present moment of the blast whereas what's 2-A about it is the whole thing everywhere and in all points in time. It would be High 3-A.

well, the said blast created the entire time stream structure

 

[Eficiente]

Which is infinitely elsewhere from the ship as it's all of time, as anything in the present is. It's not like two 2-A beings are throwing attacks at each other which are all 2-A but compressed.

 

[Reiner04]

Even going along everything here, this wouldn't be a 2-A feat as the ship would take a present moment of the blast whereas what's 2-A about it is the whole thing everywhere and in all points in time. It would be High 3-A.

Then ig you don't have any problem with a note to be removed. Noted.

 

[Reiner04]

This thread is not for scaling so leave that part off everyone from this thread.

 

[Reiner04]

I have no immediate issues with the reasonings. Yes, the supposed weapons were actually just anchors to tie the ship down to the planet via tractor beams.

It's been 4 days now and thread seems to have no problem, can we remove the note now?

 

[Firestorm808]

It would appear that the other staff have no issues with removing it. I'll do it today.

 

[Firestorm808]

Done. Closing the thread now.