- 31,295
- 27,524
I noticed a potential issue while examining this calculation:
Armadrillo' species destroy their homeworld: 2.599386266666667e+28 J (High 6-A)
The calc relies on two assumptions for the figures used which is derived from this section of the image linked in the calc:
1) The result debris from the destruction of their planet formed an asteroid belt. Therefore there must be around 1.1 to 1.9 million asteroids in an asteroid belt (the same as our IRL asteroid belt).
2) The irregular chunks of rock are the size of small Moons. Therefore every piece of the asteroid belt has the same volume as Europa.
The original mass of the Talpaedan's homeworld is then found by simply multiplying the mass of 1.5 million asteroids but the volume of Europa, using the density of the Earth. Which gets the GBE.
While there's technically no solid basis for the assumption of the number of asteroids present in the Talpaedan's asteroid belt, I can understand that assumption being used, but it seems problematic that Europa is being taken as the baseline for what a "small Moon" is for the calc. A quick example here shows that Europa is far from the smallest Moon in our Solar System:
I think a more conservative mass value should be used for the average asteroid in this asteroid belt formed from the destruction of the Talpaedan's homeworld.
Armadrillo' species destroy their homeworld: 2.599386266666667e+28 J (High 6-A)
The calc relies on two assumptions for the figures used which is derived from this section of the image linked in the calc:
Polona Luncas is not a planet but an asteroid belt in the Andromeda galaxy - a cluster of irregular chunks of rock the size of small moons - formed when, at some long-forgotten point in the past, the alien species known as Talpaedans jack-hammered their own homeworld into pieces!
1) The result debris from the destruction of their planet formed an asteroid belt. Therefore there must be around 1.1 to 1.9 million asteroids in an asteroid belt (the same as our IRL asteroid belt).
2) The irregular chunks of rock are the size of small Moons. Therefore every piece of the asteroid belt has the same volume as Europa.
The original mass of the Talpaedan's homeworld is then found by simply multiplying the mass of 1.5 million asteroids but the volume of Europa, using the density of the Earth. Which gets the GBE.
While there's technically no solid basis for the assumption of the number of asteroids present in the Talpaedan's asteroid belt, I can understand that assumption being used, but it seems problematic that Europa is being taken as the baseline for what a "small Moon" is for the calc. A quick example here shows that Europa is far from the smallest Moon in our Solar System:
I think a more conservative mass value should be used for the average asteroid in this asteroid belt formed from the destruction of the Talpaedan's homeworld.