- 6,599
- 6,441
Ai shouldn't be used for power scaling, if you don't know the rule.By the way, I asked Ai and he said it was ACA1.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Ai shouldn't be used for power scaling, if you don't know the rule.By the way, I asked Ai and he said it was ACA1.
When I asked Ai, I asked according to the VS Battle Wiki. If anyone looked at the requirements for Aca1, they looked at this wiki...Ai shouldn't be used for power scaling, if you don't know the rule.
So basically your argument is AI> scalers on the wiki... (including a staff)When I asked Ai, I asked according to the VS Battle Wiki. If anyone looked at the requirements for Aca1, they looked at this wiki...
I didn't say anything like that. Please don't do the Strawman fallacy.So basically your argument is AI> scalers on the wiki... (including a staff)
Just don't use ai for scaling stuff, if you don't understand something you are more than welcome to ask for staff members in their dms or any other scaler you know here. It's against the rules.I didn't say anything like that. Please don't do the Strawman fallacy.
I didn't know there was such a rule. Where is it written? And why is it forbidden anyway? I'm asking the AI, "according to vsb."It's against the rules.
I didn't know there was such a rule. Where is it written? And why is it forbidden anyway? I'm asking the AI, "according to vsb."
I only read the Staff Discussion. The number of people who disagreed was higher than the number of people who agreed. The number changed later, but did the person who created the Staff Discussion not update it?![]()
Banning the use of AI and ChatGPT
@Agnaa has allowed me permission me to create this Staff Thread. The Problem with AI This might go without saying at this juncture: the use of AI (e.g., ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, Grok) has been gradually rising on this wiki. I've seen several members, and some few staff members post lines of...vsbattles.com
I don't understand why this isn't working as aca1 now. This is the only thing you don't accept right now. After discussing this, I'll just leave it to the mod game.Sure, he warns Balista not to learn Wiseman's identity. He's trying to change his past and save his future. Balista, once again, goes after Wiseman's identity and dies, but if you look closely at the scene, Balista speaks to Worton twice, which surprises him. The first time was Worton from the future, and the second time was Worton coming to talk to Balista from the past.
Bro we can't wait for 2028...a bakugan crt in this economy!?!?
That thread was never finalized. There's currently no rule saying you can't use AI to help formulate an argument.![]()
Banning the use of AI and ChatGPT
@Agnaa has allowed me permission me to create this Staff Thread. The Problem with AI This might go without saying at this juncture: the use of AI (e.g., ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini, Grok) has been gradually rising on this wiki. I've seen several members, and some few staff members post lines of...vsbattles.com
Thanks.That thread was never finalized. There's currently no rule saying you can't use AI to help formulate an argument.
Though "AI said it was this" isn't any more valid of an argument in general than "my friend said it was this" so we can still throw that out.
Anyway, I essentially agree with Spaceman here.
Even if they travel back in time, they can exist simultaneously with their past selves. I think that's enough for ACA1.
He also stated that he was considering changing the past to save Balista's life.
Well that doesn't sound like Acausality 1.Thanks.
What do you think of aca1? Spaceman hasn't commented on aca1.
Got it. I'm removing Aca1 and applying the accepted changes. This can be disabled. Thanks everyone for your help.Well that doesn't sound like Acausality 1.
"Merely existing in a work with such mechanics doesn't mean the character inherently has such an immunity, especially given how they would still be affected if someone else was time-traveling instead."
Snip
snip
This is not Reactive evolution, only a power boost.Damage Boost & Reactive Evolution (Increases Bakugan's power and gives them new abilities. Professor Clay's system can keep up with the power level increases of Bakugan, but it can't keep up with Helios using Battle Gear. It shows how big the power increase given by Battle Gear is)
Or should I change to ''Accelerated Development''This is not Reactive evolution, only a power boost.
Developing greater statistics. However, if this is the only way in which they "evolve", then Accelerated Development should be given instead to avoid redundancy.
No, Reactive evolution means getting stronger while fighting, by evolving as a reaction towards threats. This means becoming naturally stronger or gaining new abilities, and is basically just an evolved version of adaptation.Or should I change to ''Accelerated Development''