• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
I didn't say anything like that. Please don't do the Strawman fallacy.
Just don't use ai for scaling stuff, if you don't understand something you are more than welcome to ask for staff members in their dms or any other scaler you know here. It's against the rules.
 
I didn't know there was such a rule. Where is it written? And why is it forbidden anyway? I'm asking the AI, "according to vsb."
 
I only read the Staff Discussion. The number of people who disagreed was higher than the number of people who agreed. The number changed later, but did the person who created the Staff Discussion not update it?

Also, as far as I understand, the reason Ai is seen as a problem is that it's thought to be more likely to cause problems in versus threads. I don't think there's any issue with which Hax a skill in a series should be. If I asked Ai about vsb, she'd look at the Aca1 description in vsb and then respond.

Edit: It's worth adding that I only asked Ai about ACA1. I added everything else in the CRT according to my own knowledge.
 
Last edited:
Whether AI said it's aca1 or aca5 or whatever else is irrelevant. I had AI tell me Hagoromo is 1-A on multiple occasions, it means basically nothing and holds no weight to the staff here.
 
Sure, he warns Balista not to learn Wiseman's identity. He's trying to change his past and save his future. Balista, once again, goes after Wiseman's identity and dies, but if you look closely at the scene, Balista speaks to Worton twice, which surprises him. The first time was Worton from the future, and the second time was Worton coming to talk to Balista from the past.
I don't understand why this isn't working as aca1 now. This is the only thing you don't accept right now. After discussing this, I'll just leave it to the mod game.
 
That thread was never finalized. There's currently no rule saying you can't use AI to help formulate an argument.

Though "AI said it was this" isn't any more valid of an argument in general than "my friend said it was this" so we can still throw that out.

Anyway, I essentially agree with Spaceman here.
 
That thread was never finalized. There's currently no rule saying you can't use AI to help formulate an argument.

Though "AI said it was this" isn't any more valid of an argument in general than "my friend said it was this" so we can still throw that out.

Anyway, I essentially agree with Spaceman here.
Thanks.

What do you think of aca1? Spaceman hasn't commented on aca1.
Even if they travel back in time, they can exist simultaneously with their past selves. I think that's enough for ACA1.

He also stated that he was considering changing the past to save Balista's life.
 
Thanks.

What do you think of aca1? Spaceman hasn't commented on aca1.
Well that doesn't sound like Acausality 1.

"Merely existing in a work with such mechanics doesn't mean the character inherently has such an immunity, especially given how they would still be affected if someone else was time-traveling instead."
 
Well that doesn't sound like Acausality 1.

"Merely existing in a work with such mechanics doesn't mean the character inherently has such an immunity, especially given how they would still be affected if someone else was time-traveling instead."
Got it. I'm removing Aca1 and applying the accepted changes. This can be disabled. Thanks everyone for your help.
 
Or should I change to ''Accelerated Development''
No, Reactive evolution means getting stronger while fighting, by evolving as a reaction towards threats. This means becoming naturally stronger or gaining new abilities, and is basically just an evolved version of adaptation.

Accelerated development is just speeding up becoming stronger or speeding up gaining abilities.

What the "booster gear" does is give them a stat boost, and possibly more abilities (such as the examples ""ki blasts""), that is not adapting or evolving in any way, but rather just normal equipment.
 
Back
Top