Are these Plot Manipulation?

[DigDig09]

man someone close this

it got derailed into Castlevania/MG shittalking way too fast :v

F

 

[StrymULTRA]

man someone close this

it got derailed into Castlevania/MG shittalking way too fast :v

You asked for it with all these downgrades though.

 

[ImmortalDread]

man someone close this

it got derailed into Castlevania/MG shittalking way too fast :v

I hope you got the answer btw, I will request the closure

 

[BestMGQScalerEver]

man someone close this

it got derailed into Castlevania/MG shittalking way too fast :v

I'll add some diversity. Man DBH is coping.

 

[ImmortalDread]

I hope she won't say "we did not answer the question and our whole intention is to derail it", because we fairly answer her question

 

[Fixxed]

1. A character has an aura that changes and warps the nature of a book, causing the book to add more contents to itself and subsequently bring those contents into reality. Said book also contains an entire reality within itself.

I dont see any narrative thing in that, even if reality it self is stated as content of that book i think still not enough. But if reality is being content that inscribed or written in that book, i think it plot

2. A character uses a spell to write a story (not a book, just an unwritten narrative), and can subsequently use that story as a trigger for other magical effects.

If that story is narrative then probably yes

 

[Vietthai96]

Fast, lazy answer:
1. Plot hax
2. Text hax

Serious answer:
I need detail contexts

 

[Theglassman12]

@Mad_Dog_of_Fujiwara depends if the book being changed also has a complete change on the reality itself and is based off of an entire narrative with some additional stuff like changing the role of characters, the setting, and any other metanarrative stuff.

If there's additional meta-context with the story thing then it could be plot hax, if not it might just be something else.

@Tony_di_bugalu Yeah I remember a lot, like your copium over how hard Symphonia is and saying it's harder than SMT.

@ActuallySpaceMan42 if by aggressive you mean I get skeptical on some high ball arguments that lacks any scans then sure.

@Dereck03 if I were to imitate them I'd argue against a japanese speaker about a mistranslation for a long while.

 

[Dereck03]

@Dereck03 if I were to imitate them I'd argue against a japanese speaker about a mistranslation for a long while.

is that a Fixxed moment?

 

[Theglassman12]

Maybe, maybe not.

 

[Mad_Dog_of_Fujiwara]

Considering I don't think any two people have given the same answer, I guess the real answer is just "find some more evidence, dumbass". This can be closed now, if nobody minds.

 

[Theglassman12]

closing.