according to almost what everyone stated here...you can't go beyond tier 1 if the difference isn't infinite heck, even if it stated there are higher dimensional beings incomprehensible to the lower ones, transcending spatio-temporal dimensions and more. it's just isn't enough according to @Sus @Everything12 @Planck69 @FluffyCreatureZ
That pretty much works when you go beyond 5D
Archie fits nicely into this
Tiering System FAQ
A: Whether higher-dimensional entities qualify for such high tiers or not depends on several different factors, which may take root both in and out-of-verse. To explain this situation, we must first clarify what exactly being higher-dimensional entails. In a way, yes, though not how most would...vsbattles.fandom.com
I mean we should wait a for a few days at least
Most likely wouldn't be enough since there is so much information that you can fill in profiles instead of the blog itself.
Wait for what? For another 5 posts of absolutely nothing happening over the span of the next 72 hours? Because a downgrade sure isn't coming from it.
Well, this didn’t move for shit since I posted that comment so yeah
When I said sonic wasn't enough for tier 1, I was basing it off the justification which didn't really go into detail.
I can't read.
There's ALOT more to Kirby than just "transcending space and time", but I still strongly believe they're at least equally legitimate. Low 1-C Kirby supporters and Low 1-C Archie Sonic supporters are similar in the sense that they both have valid arguments but they don't phrase them in a clear and concise enough way, which leads to many people misinterpreting their arguments.
Yeah, that was a mistake on my part. Kirby and Archie are only really similar in the way that I mentioned above and in the sense that they both make our tier 1 standards immensely confusing. (Hell, Low 1-C Kirby isn't even a character upgrade yet). It turns out I was one of the people who misunderstood the basis for Low 1-C Archie Sonic, and that lead me to make a bit of a false equivalence.
arigato
Yeah it's fine.
To be honest, our standards for "transcending space and time" are a mess
indeedy
anyone who wants to rant this to ultima?
Maybe, but I think rather than just personally ranting to him, making a CRT or atleast discussion thread pointing out problems for the particular standards in FAQ page would be more helpful, as it would give others a chance to participate as well and that would lead to higher chance of revisions
but the real question is...who's the madlad that's going to make that CRT?
Already did, but I didn't cover everything in our discussion. Only the parts that specifically confused me. I also made a Q&A thread. It turns out our standards are just as straightforward as the FAQ makes them seem, but some other staff members just seem to make up new rules on the spot to make them more complex than necessary.
My next thread isn't directly about this, but it's definitely going to bring attention to it.
That's very annoying...I have a verse with potentially 1B or higher statistics yet they shot it down because there weren't any statements of each "dimensions being infinitely superior to the others" bs
Kudos to you if the thread succeeds tho.
Maybe me... Just being lazy at compiling all my points and then forming argument based on that
Archie Sonic is really only known as the fatehax guy here, for an obvious reason
True
