Aleph Null

[Another_Council]

Could destroying an Aleph Null amount of universes be considered to be above baseline 2-A? Since, aleph null by itself is countably infinite.

 

[Oblivion_Of_The_Endless]

That's the same of destroying infinite universes, so baseline.

 

[Hasty12345]

Isn't that baseline 2-A?

 

[Oblivion_Of_The_Endless]

Yes, there is no difference between infinite universes and countably infinite universes.

 

[Another_Council]

Weird

 

[Roun12]

Aleph-Null is the smallest infinite cardinal. It's literally the baseline.

 

[Kowalski]

Could destroying an Aleph Null amount of universes be considered to be above baseline 2-A? Since, aleph null by itself is countably infinite.

Aleph null is the cardinality of the set of all natural numbers, which is basically infinite set or baseline 2-A.

 

[OnsokunoSonic]

No, because bijection.

 

[Achille]

Could destroying an Aleph Null amount of universes be considered to be above baseline 2-A? Since, aleph null by itself is countably infinite.

yep

 

[Yaozin]

yep

Isn't it actually the basic 2a?

 

[Achille]

Isn't it actually the basic 2a?

Actually, yes, when we say 2-A tier, we are talking about countably infinite universes.

Aleph 0 is countable infinity. So the "most basic" would be equal to 2-A.

However, since aleph 0 extends to infinity, it can also scale above the 2-A tier depending on context. It totally depends on the context.

 

[Yaozin]

Actually, yes, when we say 2-A tier, we are talking about countably infinite universes.

Aleph 0 is countable infinity. So the "most basic" would be equal to 2-A.

However, since aleph 0 extends to infinity, it can also scale above the 2-A tier depending on context. It totally depends on the context.

Although it depends on the context, I usually agree that aleph 0 corresponds to the basic 2 a.

 

[Achille]

Although it depends on the context, I usually agree that aleph 0 corresponds to the basic 2 a.