- 165,200
- 72,175
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
AI and ChatGPT Concerns
- Thread starter Flashlight237
- Start date
- Status
- 10,502
- 11,574
Should I apply it? Flashlight seems to be ok with using my text + adding a reliable sources section on the calc page. But I'm not sure if everyone else is satisfied with that as well. We had quite mixed opinions here.
- 165,200
- 72,175
- 18,393
- 14,311
ChatGPT themselves officially stated to not be reliant in terms of sources as they may give some inaccurate information.
You are just simply repeating what they said (People simply needs to read)
(As you… always do anyway in regular basis? Perhaps this is common knowledge, but I guess a draft is fine)
I fixed DT's draft a bit to improve clarity and conciseness
You are just simply repeating what they said (People simply needs to read)
Also, DT's draft is fine in my opinion, you simply need to ask them from where they got the information, and they simply give you sources.
(As you… always do anyway in regular basis? Perhaps this is common knowledge, but I guess a draft is fine)
I fixed DT's draft a bit to improve clarity and conciseness
Last edited:
- 17,578
- 12,905
Definitely agree with DontTalkDT’s post
it will act as a helping tool to speed things up and then be confirmed/reevaluated by the one who uses it
completely banning itor saying that it’s a skill issue and that it’s not needed, is just like saying it’s not needed when you use bots or calculators to speed things up
Otherwise in terms of calculations page I don’t think I have enough knowledge about that stuff
it will act as a helping tool to speed things up and then be confirmed/reevaluated by the one who uses it
completely banning it
Otherwise in terms of calculations page I don’t think I have enough knowledge about that stuff
IdiosyncraticLawyer
Username OnlyVS Battles
Joke Battles
Administrator
Content Moderator
Translation Helper
- 2,881
- 3,355
It's unreliable in the same way Wikipedia and our site are unreliable. See here for more details.
- 18,393
- 14,311
I am aware? But the OP make it as they themselves did not suggest it while the AI clearly said that in their ToS, in their homepage, and while you are using it.
People are simply stupid for not noticing that.
Also, I am aware Wikipedia is not reliable as people simply can edit it. Moreover, the rule that he suggested it already exists in the calculation guidelines.
People are simply stupid for not noticing that.
Also, I am aware Wikipedia is not reliable as people simply can edit it. Moreover, the rule that he suggested it already exists in the calculation guidelines.
- 5,968
- 4,158
I agree with DT's post as well as ImmortalDread's modified version.
By the way, AI arts are technically within the scope of the new rule and we have discussed it in https://vsbattles.com/threads/ai-art-for-characters-with-no-images.152270/ before. The rule proposal could include explanation of our stance of such usage of AI.
By the way, AI arts are technically within the scope of the new rule and we have discussed it in https://vsbattles.com/threads/ai-art-for-characters-with-no-images.152270/ before. The rule proposal could include explanation of our stance of such usage of AI.
- 30,069
- 31,324
DT's suggestion looks great as always.
- 18,393
- 14,311
Here is the draft but generally, in my opinion, it should be mentioned as in general, when you are searching for information, citing the source and checking its reliability is your own duty irregardless of whether you got it from Google or AI.
- 6,489
- 1,200
This is still a concern for me
- 4,222
- 2,246
- Thread starter
- #93
Is it really hard to just look for a .edu or a .gov thing in a website address? Because that sounds like a skill issue.
- 6,489
- 1,200
- 6,489
- 1,200
This is what I get when I try searching up the enthalpy of vaporization of quartz glass, I don't see any .edu or .gov address there
- 3,633
- 2,505
I believe this draft is good.
A.I. is a tool like any other, and can be very helpful if used constructively, but this rule stresses the importance of checking over its generations, and ultimately allows its use while putting the responsibility of accuracy on the user.
Though, the A.I. itself should obviously never be used as a citation, and even if the information is originally learned through the A.I., the original source should still be tracked down. The A.I. itself tends to be helpful for this, as it has provided me specific comic issues in the past, for example.
- 10,502
- 11,574
Where should the text go? The CRT section of the Discussion Rules?
- 165,200
- 72,175
I think that it should likely be placed in our Editing Rules page, but am not sure in which section.
- 18,393
- 14,311
The text should be added under "Be Constructive"
- 10,502
- 11,574
Guess that works. I added it there.
That leaves adding the reliable pages section.
Any suggestion regarding such pages?
The Engineering ToolBox
Free tools and information for engineering and design of technical applications.
www.engineeringtoolbox.com
are some I frequently find useful.
- 18,393
- 14,311
Those are fine, yap
- 165,200
- 72,175
Thank you.
Feel free to summon our calc group and more knowledgeable still active former calc group members if you need help with input and suggestions.That leaves adding the reliable pages section.
Any suggestion regarding such pages?
andThe Engineering ToolBox
Free tools and information for engineering and design of technical applications.
are some I frequently find useful.
- 6,489
- 1,200
I don't think we've addressed this yet
And this isn't wondering what if the resource is a book that maybe not available online or is in a foreign language
- 18,393
- 14,311
I can guarantee you that ChatGPT or other AI tools have no connection to those websites either.
Also, which information are you referring to? Since you can bring an argument to the table, but I would like to hear instances or moments where you had difficiulties to find an information for your calculation.
Also, which information are you referring to? Since you can bring an argument to the table, but I would like to hear instances or moments where you had difficiulties to find an information for your calculation.
Rakih_Elyan
He/Him- 3,929
- 2,755
After getting permission from Antvasima to post here, I will gladly offer you guys one of solutions for this ChatGPT problem.
There exist safe and secure ChatGPT plug-in named WebChatGPT, its available on Chrome or another browsers that i don't know of.
What did this plugin do?
It's simple, this plugin will access the current internet and search for any legitimate websites for the purpose of using information from them instead the database from their server (Open AI), plus with their citation (The adress of the website).
Here is the example.
Let just said you need to calculate how fast is a man dashing from earth to moon in 2 second, and then you enter the appropriate prompt into the ChatGPT to know the answer of.
ChatGPT will access the current internet and use the information from them with citation, and then calculate theam according to the information found in these websites.
Hope this help.
There exist safe and secure ChatGPT plug-in named WebChatGPT, its available on Chrome or another browsers that i don't know of.
What did this plugin do?
It's simple, this plugin will access the current internet and search for any legitimate websites for the purpose of using information from them instead the database from their server (Open AI), plus with their citation (The adress of the website).
Here is the example.
Let just said you need to calculate how fast is a man dashing from earth to moon in 2 second, and then you enter the appropriate prompt into the ChatGPT to know the answer of.
ChatGPT will access the current internet and use the information from them with citation, and then calculate theam according to the information found in these websites.
Hope this help.
- 165,200
- 72,175
IdiosyncraticLawyer
Username OnlyVS Battles
Joke Battles
Administrator
Content Moderator
Translation Helper
- 2,881
- 3,355
Bump.
IdiosyncraticLawyer
Username OnlyVS Battles
Joke Battles
Administrator
Content Moderator
Translation Helper
- 2,881
- 3,355
Bump.
- 10,502
- 11,574
¯\(ツ)/¯
It's neat, I guess. However, it generally still falls under the same criteria of "Just check that what you're posting is true."
IdiosyncraticLawyer
Username OnlyVS Battles
Joke Battles
Administrator
Content Moderator
Translation Helper
- 2,881
- 3,355
What's left to do here?
- 18,393
- 14,311
Nothing. The draft has been added. This can be closed.
IdiosyncraticLawyer
Username OnlyVS Battles
Joke Battles
Administrator
Content Moderator
Translation Helper
- 2,881
- 3,355
Someone close it, then.
- Status
