• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

AE and Conceptual manipulation

Messages
1,191
Reaction score
261
I have 3 questions I need to be clear about.

1. If a being is made of collective memory of people from a whole dimension, does that qualify for AE? And which type?

2. What would a being of reason be which governs certain aspect of reality? And what type of conceptual manipulation is needed to interact, to destroy such being?
 
I have 3 questions I need to be clear about.

1. If a being is made of collective memory of people from a whole dimension, does that qualify for AE? And which type?

2. What would a being of reason be which governs certain aspect of reality? And what type of conceptual manipulation is needed to interact, to destroy such being?
Any particular thing you are referring to? It sound familiar.
 
Any particular thing you are referring to? It sound familiar.
1. Senna from bleach who is a being made of memories of souls of a dimension. Saw others getting due to interacting and destroying such AE 1 beings from other vedse without having any exclusive setting.

2. Dangai cleaner being of reason with which shinigami can't interact with despite having AE1 interaction. And aizen destroyed it with a glance.

These are the context.
 
1 ) Information manipulation type 1

2 ) It depends on how the verse treats the concept of REASON , verses that are laws, other concepts or information of type 1 or 2

Edit : In Aizen's case, it should probably be CM type 3 since it doesn't refer to knowledge/information or law, and it seems that reason is not well defined in the verse.
 
1 ) Information manipulation type 1

2 ) It depends on how the verse treats the concept of REASON , verses that are laws, other concepts or information of type 1 or 2

Edit : In Aizen's case, it should probably be CM type 3 since it doesn't refer to knowledge/information or law, and it seems that reason is not well defined in the verse.
1. Verse that has info as fundamental aspect has it as IM along with AE 1 interaction. Shouldn’t the verse that has concept as fundamental aspect have that as CM?

2. Does reason needs to be defined? Shouldn’t it be by dafeault concept 2 since these are what makes up universal laws unless defined other way. And material world is modelled after our world.
 
1. Verse that has info as fundamental aspect has it as IM along with AE 1 interaction. Shouldn’t the verse that has concept as fundamental aspect have that as CM?

2. Does reason needs to be defined? Shouldn’t it be by dafeault concept 2 since these are what makes up universal laws unless defined other way. And material world is modelled after our world.
1) Senna was made of memories, which refers to knowledge that does not act as a fundamental aspect for anything.

2) Yes it is necessary , because there is no standard on the site for REASON, I don't think there is even a fictional standard for it, there are verses that treat it as casuality and law and others as ideas and concepts.Koutotsu was destroyed, if he was type 2 all the space-time he rules should be destroyed too

Edit : In Senna's case, knowledge is treated as type 1 information within the site, so it would not be a concept.
 
Last edited:
Depend on how memories is treated in the verse, some verse memories is info 1 knowledge, some verse treat memories as abstract thing
 
Back
Top