• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Admins & Moderators on CRTs: The Most Controversial Staff Thread

Thank you for your reply. 🙏❤️
 
Antvasima said:
Hmm. That is true. We preferably need more staff input, but we also cannot stall such important revisions for too long because of lack of staff interest. 🙏
Click to expand...
I've preemptively made the two changes discussed to the sandbox, so they can be reviewed now and posted as soon as there's enough approval.

Changed first sentence so it's original:
This site only functions as a result of volunteer work from our staff team, and we're constantly in need of new candidates as we can't count on existing staff to be around forever.
Click to expand...

Added numerical requirements:
There are just a few contribution requirements for applications of certain positions to be considered, as follows:
Click to expand...
 
I think it's okay. Admin approvals are needed though.

Planck, SomebodyData and DarkDragonMedeus agreed on this page above.
 
Antvasima said:
Thank you for helping out.

So do we have sufficient approvals now to apply our two new sub-forums and FinePoint's new "Staff Applications" page? 🙏

https://vsbattles.com/threads/admin...ontroversial-staff-thread.187364/post-7792619

https://vsbattles.com/threads/admin...ontroversial-staff-thread.187364/post-7793067

Click to expand...
Antvasima said:
I would greatly appreciate several confirmations here. 🙏
Click to expand...
Random-Helper323 said:
I think it's okay. Admin approvals are needed though.

Planck, SomebodyData and DarkDragonMedeus agreed on this page above.
Click to expand...
@AKM sama @DontTalkDT @Mr. Bambu @Just a Random Butler @Agnaa @Qawsedf234 @Celestial_Pegasus @Ultima_Reality @Elizhaa @Damage3245 @Starter_Pack @Abstractions @Colonel_Krukov @SamanPatou @GyroNutz @Firestorm808 @Maverick_Zero_X @Crabwhale @GrathOfLux @Dereck03 @LephyrTheRevanchist
 
Bump.

It is extremely important that we get our two new sub-forums accepted. 🙏
 
I gave the page basic autoconfirmed protection (for now) so FinePoint can keep working on it.

Would you like me to add it to the staff template? It might be best to let Admins and above make that decision.
 
I will ask our forum system manager to create a new sub-forum named "Self-Evident Content Revisions" with the following header text, and placed right underneath our current "Content Revisions" sub-forum, then:

"Often, minor details need to be added or removed from pages, with a self-evident explanation for why. Any discussion pertaining to such revisions are best done in this board.

Before posting, make sure that your proposed revisions qualify as self-evident and minor. This includes adding abilities that are blatantly obvious, such as Bodily Weaponry for an entity with prominent claws.

Typically, revisions proposed in this board should be so obvious that they do not even require significant arguments or interpretation, and therefore require far less oversight by our staff.

Note that posting revisions here that don't fit this description will lead to those revisions being moved to the Content Revision board, and repeated and blatant attempts to abuse the leniency of this board will be treated as rule violations."

As well as create another sub-forum named "Staff Applications", with the following header text, and placed right underneath our "Private Rule-Violation Reports" sub-forum:

"A forum wherein you can apply to become a member of our staff, with the applications only visible to yourself and our current staff members, but only do so if you are genuinely qualified and willing to extensively help out in our community. For information how to do so, please click on this link."

The discussion threads in the "Staff Applications" sub-forum should also only be possible to see for the member who posts them and our current VS Battles Wiki staff members.

Is all of that acceptable to go ahead with? 🙏
 
Antvasima said:
I will ask our forum system manager to create a new sub-forum named "Self-Evident Content Revisions" with the following header text, and placed right underneath our current "Content Revisions" sub-forum, then:

"Often, minor details need to be added or removed from pages, with a self-evident explanation for why. Any discussion pertaining to such revisions are best done in this board.

Before posting, make sure that your proposed revisions qualify as self-evident and minor. This includes adding abilities that are blatantly obvious, such as Bodily Weaponry for an entity with prominent claws.

Typically, revisions proposed in this board should be so obvious that they do not even require significant arguments or interpretation, and therefore require far less oversight by our staff.

Note that posting revisions here that don't fit this description will lead to those revisions being moved to the Content Revision board, and repeated and blatant attempts to abuse the leniency of this board will be treated as rule violations."

As well as create another sub-forum named "Staff Applications", with the following header text, and placed right underneath our "Private Rule-Violation Reports" sub-forum:

"A forum wherein you can apply to become a member of our staff, with the applications only visible to yourself and our current staff members, but only do so if you are genuinely qualified and willing to extensively help out in our community. For information how to do so, please click on this link."

The discussion threads in the "Staff Applications" sub-forum should also only be possible to see for the member who posts them and our current VS Battles Wiki staff members.

Is all of that acceptable to go ahead with? 🙏
Click to expand...
Anyway, should there be any adjustments to this, or is it fine to go ahead now? 🙏
 
Our forum system manager has created our two new sub-forums now. 🙏🙂❤️🎉

Bureaucrats:

@AKM sama @DontTalkDT @Mr. Bambu

Super Moderators:

@DarkDragonMedeus @Just a Random Butler @Agnaa @Qawsedf234

Administrators:

@SomebodyData @Celestial_Pegasus @Ultima_Reality @Elizhaa @Damage3245 @Starter_Pack @Abstractions @Colonel_Krukov @SamanPatou @GyroNutz @Firestorm808 @Maverick_Zero_X @Crabwhale @GrathOfLux @Dereck03 @Planck69 @LephyrTheRevanchist

Content Moderators:

@Shadowbokunohero @QrowBarr @Crazylatin77 @Zaratthustra @ElixirBlue @Tllmbrg @Nehz_XZX @Therefir @IdiosyncraticLawyer @Catzlaflame @TWILIGHT-OP @Random-Helper323 @YmTheSuper @EddisherSound @Kaydee1648

Thread Moderators:

@JustSomeWeirdo @Theglassman12 @Duedate8898 @Armorchompy @CrimsonStarFallen @LordTracer @Emirp sumitpo @FinePoint @Elizio33 @Mr._Propeller_Hat @AbaddonTheDisappointment @Catzlaflame @ActuallySpaceMan42 @Nierre @Reiner04 @Dalesean027 @Oblivion_Of_The_Endless @Imaginym @Vietthai96 @Godernet @TWILIGHT-OP @Random-Helper323

Calc Group:

@DontTalkDT @Executor_N0 @Mr. Bambu @Therefir @Ugarik @DMUA @Damage3245 @TheRustyOne @Armorchompy @Migue79 @Psychomaster35 @KLOL506 @M3X_2.0 @Dark-Carioca @AbaddonTheDisappointment @Aguywhodoesthings @Agnaa @Dalesean027 @DemiiPowa @Flashlight237 @SeijiSetto @SunDaGamer @Naito-desu @Floxy178 @ElJoaki5 @Drite77

Translation Helpers:

@IdiosyncraticLawyer @RitsuØ1 @SeijiSetto @RaikiKurohane99

Image Helpers:

@The_Divine_Phoenix @Colonel_Krukov @Zaratthustra @ZackMoon1234 @Dark-Carioca @MistaClean @MonkeyOfLife @FinePoint @Mr._Propeller_Hat @Muchacho_mrm @Da3ggman @Kaydee1648 @DaReaperMan
 
FinePoint said:
Aren't both of those for VsBattles specifically?
Shouldn't they be moved to be below it and not all the other wikis?
Click to expand...
Maybe. I am not certain. It is a similar forum in function to the reports forum. 🙏
 
I don't think it's the most important thing, but I do agree with Fine that it should just be under VSBattles. As it stands, it will probably confuse the uninitiated at least some percentage of the time.
 
I have asked about it now. 🙏
 
It has been properly handled now. 🙏
 
Antvasima said:
3) Continue to encourage our current staff members to attempt to find good staff candidates to suggest to our bureaucrats. The current staff members can then write applications for the regular members in our new semi-private sub-forum, ask them to do so themselves, or they can collaborate to do so.

4) Some kind of coaching program in which our current staff members instruct regular members they think seem promising, and if the regular members seem able to properly handle the staff work, they can write an application and mention official recommendations in it.

5) I contact our past staff candidates that were only rejected due to our current staff members being unfamiliar with them, and ask them to write applications in our new sub-forum.
Click to expand...
So I suppose that these are the potentially remaining tasks in my old list then. Or are there any other good suggestions that should be added to it? 🙏
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Lloydblitzed
  • Locked
Big Verses and Minor CRTs: Let's do some Magic
Replies
25
Views
3K
Elizhaa
Elizhaa
Mbpoops
Acausality and a bit of cosmology specific abilities indexing clarifications
Replies
16
Views
2K
Ciel_Trinity439
Ciel_Trinity439
Vzearr
  • Locked
The Tokyo Revengers Verse (STAFF ONLY)
Replies
20
Views
2K
Reiner04
Reiner04
FinePoint
  • Locked
Thread Moderators and Staff Threads
Replies
39
Views
5K
FinePoint
FinePoint
Thanganimator
  • Locked
False R>F
2 3
Replies
98
Views
9K
Antvasima
Antvasima
Back
Top