Acausality Questions

[Purgy]

Is it possible for an entire verse to function under the idea that time paradoxes are impossible? Essentially giving everyone in the verse Type 1 Acausality by default due to how the verse works

Why isn't Type 2 Acausality separated? For example, two separate types of Acausality, one for existing in the past but not having a future and another for the opposite.

If a character has Type 2 Acausality but other characters in the verse have prior knowledge and even memories of said character, does that make the character having Type 2 Acausality invalid?

 

[Rez]

Is it possible for an entire verse to function under the idea that time paradoxes are impossible? Essentially giving everyone in the verse Type 1 Acausality by default due to how the verse works

Dragon Ball kinda of works like that as any changes made through history simply results in the formation of a new timeline the previous time line is not affected by it but it doesn't gives them type 1 acausality

 

[Purgy]

Dragon Ball kinda of works like that as any changes made through history simply results in the formation of a new timeline the previous time line is not affected by it but it doesn't gives them type 1 acausality

Why?

 

[Thelastmlg]

I think is because is a verse mechanic rather than a character immunity, in dbz's terms they are just protected by spacetime avoiding paradoxes themselves, but someone with acausality type 1 would be immune no matter what cosmology they are in.

Yeah it should.

Probably, depends on the characters remembering him

 

[Bernkastelll]

Someone with Real Acausality type 1 in DBS is Goku Black from DBS, since, his case is not due mechanic of the verse

 

[Purgy]

bump

 

[HammerStrikes219]

Someone with Real Acausality type 1 in DBS is Goku Black from DBS, since, his case is not due mechanic of the verse

Wasn’t it because Goku Black has a time ring though?

 

[Bernkastelll]

Wasn’t it because Goku Black has a time ring though?

Yes

 

[Purgy]

bump

 

[Purgy]

bump

 

[Purgy]

bump

 

[Purgy]

Bump

 

[ZoroNotZolo]

Following.

 

[Purgy]

bump

 

[Purgy]

bump

 

[Purgy]

bump

 

[Purgy]

bump

 

[Purgy]

bump

 

[ZoroNotZolo]

Is it possible for an entire verse to function under the idea that time paradoxes are impossible? Essentially giving everyone in the verse Type 1 Acausality by default due to how the verse works

If I were to guess, it'd probably have to be explicitly stated that the individuals themselves are immune to paradoxes. If it's impossible because of some universal law present in the verse, then I don't think they should have Type 1.

Why isn't Type 2 Acausality separated? For example, two separate types of Acausality, one for existing in the past but not having a future and another for the opposite.

Probably to kill two birds with one stone, if I was to guess. But I'm not entirely sure.

If a character has Type 2 Acausality but other characters in the verse have prior knowledge and even memories of said character, does that make the character having Type 2 Acausality invalid?

I don't think so. That's just their perception of the character. For example, Character A fights/encounters/does whatever with Character B who has Type 2 Acausality. Character A thinks back on it five years later. A thinks he's remembering a past version of B, but it was B's present existence that they're actually recalling, just one that was five years ago.

 

[Purgy]

bump

 

[Purgy]

bump