• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Acausality? questions

4,286
2,112
So lets just say that there is a character that exists outside the laws of physics and/or exists beyond a conventional realm, and therefore cannot be interacted with normally.

Would this suffice for Type 4 or 5 Acausality? or some other power?

And would a character need a specific power to be able to affect them? Or can it just be listed that they can affect said characters?
 
Looks like type 4, although more context would be better.
These are the full quotes for both English and Japanese

"Their existence lies beyond that of our physical realm... so conventional weaponry doesn't really faze them.

The only thing that can stop a Mirage is the power of another Mirage".

"They are outside the laws of physics, thus they cannot be destroyed through conventional weaponry.

The only way to destroy a Mirage is through the power of a Mirage."
 
Sounds more like a different physiology and resistance to physics manipulation, or invulnerability, if physics don't apply you'd be hard to interact with since you need stuff like energy transference, inertia, force, etc to be affected, but that has nothing to do with causality.
 
Back
Top