Absorbing a planets energy equals?

[LordGriffin1000]

What tier would a character be for absorbing the energy of an entire planet (note that the planet is destroyed as a result), and multiple that result by 4.

 

[Wokistan]

Planets don't really have "energy", unless they meant like the RKE or heat it exhudes or something. What's the context of this?

Since it destroys the planet you could probably call it 4 times baseline 5-B, if it's uncalcable.

 

[WeeklyBattles]

High 6-A going by Sonic's page

 

[Wokistan]

Sonic is there via a surface wipe calc it seems.

 

[Lorenzo.r.2nd]

Planets don't really have "energy", unless they meant like the RKE or heat it exhudes or something. What's the context of this?
Since it destroys the planet you could probably call it 4 times baseline 5-B, if it's uncalcable.

wouldnt maybe absorbtion possibly mean the freezing of the planet? if u take away energy, u lose heat, lose heat and it gets colder. makes sense right?

 

[WeeklyBattles]

Sonic is there via a surface wipe calc it seems.

Eggrobo (Sonic Lost World)

This is what Sonic scales to, its high 6-A for absorbing the planet's energy

 

[Wokistan]

@ Weekly

Looks like Eggrobo actually scales to sonic, with that being a supportive feat.

 

[Paulo.junior.969]

The link on Sonic's page takes you to "Average Surface Destruction".

 

[WeeklyBattles]

Nope, Sonic scales to the Eggrobo, there was a massiv ethread about it a few months ago

 

[Paulo.junior.969]

Then why does Sonic's page link you to "Average Surface Destruction"?

 

[Wokistan]

Link it then.

Doesn't really make sense that he'd scale to a guy with no calc and have a calc listed on the page. You would think the actual number listed is what's relevant.

 

[WeeklyBattles]

https://vsbattles.com/vsbattles/1506359

 

[Lorenzo.r.2nd]

Planets don't really have "energy", unless they meant like the RKE or heat it exhudes or something. What's the context of this?
Since it destroys the planet you could probably call it 4 times baseline 5-B, if it's uncalcable.

wouldnt maybe absorbtion possibly mean the freezing of the planet? if u take away energy, u lose heat, lose heat and it gets colder. makes sense right?

bump

 

[Wokistan]

Griffin did also say that this destroyed the planet. It probably wouldn't go below 5-C, since that's the lowest I've seen a planet bust go.

When he sees this, he should just post the context.

 

[WeeklyBattles]

Then why does Sonic's page link you to "Average Surface Destruction"?

Because of Ifrit (Sonic the Hedgehog)

Even though Sonic never fought the Ifrit that performed the High 6-A feat...

 

[WeeklyBattles]

Lets not derail though

 

[Paulo.junior.969]

Then why is it on his profile?

 

[Lorenzo.r.2nd]

@lord did this happen in an anime, or something else? like, can u show us what happened?

 

[WeeklyBattles]

@Paulo Beats me

 

[Paulo.junior.969]

Someone just forgot to take the calc out again? Man, this wiki can be pretty careless sometimes.

 

[LordGriffin1000]

It's a statement. A monster was absorbing the energy from 4 different worlds and as a side effect they all would have been destroy if he wasn't stopped.

 

[Lorenzo.r.2nd]

people arent perfect. but yes, true lol

 

[Wokistan]

Generic planetary destruction is just 5-B, though generic energy absorption is weird to quantify. If it's absorbing rotational energy or the heat of the planet or mass energy conversion of the planet or whatever they'd all be way different from one another.

 

[Lorenzo.r.2nd]

@lord, thanks my dude. i see, hmm statements are tough. i think we had a calc based off the statement that said this guy could cut the earth in half, while having the low end 5C and high end 5A. well, i think that maybe we could do a freezing-based calc (energy is equevalent to what, in this case, btw? like, life force, chi, chakra, or just magic?), since he took away the energy from those planets (lack of energy= lack of heat, lack of heat= colder temps). just an idea.

 

[LordGriffin1000]

It doesn't go into detail about the energy it's absorbing, just that it states the monster is absorbing the energy from said planets and as a result they would be destroyed.

 

[Wokistan]

Well then I would just say to go with 5-B via planetary destruction statement.

 

[Lorenzo.r.2nd]

Well then I would just say to go with 5-B via planetary destruction statement.

he says no planets were destroyed, but yeah, i think a 5B could do the trick