• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Absolute Zero Question: Seemingly contradictory properties

Kaiou1991

He/Him
Messages
104
Reaction score
86
A technique is described as:

"Aquarius Camus's ultimate secret technique, in which he strikes the opponent with a wave of cold air that reduces atomic vibrations to the limit by means of his cosmo. its cold air is infinitely close to absolute zero, immobilizing the target on an atomic level."

Clearly, the attack is stated not to be "Absolute Zero", however, the properties described - to the best of my knowledge - explain the effect of something reaching absolute zero temperatures. This isn't the only instance of the character being stated to be able to stop all motion of atoms using their attacks (although there's no explicit mention of (being or not being) absolute zero at all in those instances).

I'm just curious how we would treat this seemingly contradictory explanation.
 
I mean there's barely a difference between absolute zero and this so just put the ability as absolute zero but write out how it works in the description of the ability. I don't think it'll change much in a match.
 
A technique is described as:

"Aquarius Camus's ultimate secret technique, in which he strikes the opponent with a wave of cold air that reduces atomic vibrations to the limit by means of his cosmo. its cold air is infinitely close to absolute zero, immobilizing the target on an atomic level."

Clearly, the attack is stated not to be "Absolute Zero", however, the properties described - to the best of my knowledge - explain the effect of something reaching absolute zero temperatures. This isn't the only instance of the character being stated to be able to stop all motion of atoms using their attacks (although there's no explicit mention of (being or not being) absolute zero at all in those instances).

I'm just curious how we would treat this seemingly contradictory explanation.
Just Iisting it as absoIute zero is fine with expIanation in the description. It couId aIso be such that the verse has its own definition of absoIute zero.
 
Back
Top