About 3-A, High 3-A and Low 2-C

[Adamjensen2030]

Correct me if I'm wrong but I think that Low 2-C is Infinitely above 3-A.

Also is Low 2-C Infinitely above High 3-A or is Low 2-C barely superior to High 3-A?

Thanks for readig.

 

[FTW395]

Low 2-C is indeed infinitely above 3-A and from what I can understand High 3-A and Low 2-C are almost the same.

 

[Adamjensen2030]

So Low 2-C defeats High 3-A with difficulty correct?

 

[Kaltias]

Infinitely stronger than 3-A = High 3-A (3D version)

Infinitely stronger than High 3-A (3D version) = High 3-A (4D version)

Vastly stronger than High 3-A (4D version) = Low 2-C

So Low 2-C is actually infinitely stronger than something infinitely stronger than 3-A

 

[Kaltias]

Also no, Low 2-C stomps the 4D High 3-A rather easily and absolutely obliterate the 3D High 3-A

 

[Adamjensen2030]

So even if the High 3-A (4D version) did manage to affect time which isn't universal range then Low 2-C beats High 3-A (4D version) with difficulty?

 

[Anonimoe7875]

Still obliterate unless the High 3-A have some good hax .-.

 

[Kaltias]

Usually the Low 2-C takes it rather easily, thanks to the AP advantage, but it mostly depends on the degree of the High 3-A, and the Low 2-C must be baseline Low 2-C or it stomps.

 

[Adamjensen2030]

Thanks for the answers.

I appreciate it.

 

[FTW395]

I really doubt there's a 3D High 3-A and a 4D High 3-A. From what I understand a Low 2-C being is a 4-D being, who is infinitely stronger than a 3-D being thus equal to an infinitely strong 3-D being. Or maybe a Low 2-C being is like infinity + 1.

 

[Anonimoe7875]

Low 2-C = 4-D universal power

High 3-A (4-D) = 4-D but lower than universal power

High 3-A (3-D) = Infinite 3-D power

 

[Kaltias]

The two types of High 3-A are literally explained on the Tiering System page.

Also, no. Infinite 3D power is less than finite 4D power the same way an infinite geometrical plane is smaller than a finite cube

 

[Antvasima]

Kaltias is essentially correct.