With how much they throw out infinity there and how it's used, hard to quantify especially their layers of hax and well...everything actually lol. Someone somehow having a "bigger infinity" well...that will quickly not be the case infront of them that's for sure. Especially when they drop an actual setting where they declare they're the strongest character too that can't be surpassed either. More than a normal growth is needed to surpass that plot. Benetnash and Orm will be involved as well (albeit left in the dust by the other two as usual, not their fault truly)
Seems like the light years stuff is alright, and the final point has a good arguement for qualitative. Assuming it does goes through, would any of their descriptions need to change? Only one though I guess is Alovenus who can have a part removed to leave the one where she paints over the final point.
I think maybe the difference between each infinity is more impressive than baseline.
The simple logic is that each Setting taking place in the Final Point is 1A by virtue of their nature, as they each represent an R>F gap between one another. From this perspective as Alovenus' existence by default is infinite in comparison to creation, these settings would view everything they have surpassed as finite (equal to 1) in comparison to their own infinite status, which would suggest that the difference between them would or could act as an R>F transcendence.
It could work like this:
Setting X>Y
Setting Z>X
Setting Y here would have infinite stats in the final point but in the eyes of X their stats would be finite and then X would get their stats viewed as finite by Z etc.
To clarify, anything below the Final Point is, by definition, finite in comparison to Baseline Alovenus (infinite stats). Thus, Ruphas and others, before reaching the Final Point, had finite stats regardless of their power. You can view it as follows:
Y: Normal Universes/All of creation
X: Ruphas' existence
Z: Alovenus' existence
The difference between X and Z functions in the same manner as the difference between Y and X.
So lastly Z views X (who is 1A) the same way X views everything below it (below the Final Point.)
As Alovenus explained herself:
"Even if there was someone labeled as the strongest among these characters in a setting this overwhelming, things would be flipped upside down by nothing but one word from the author, or in other words, God. That being that there was an even stronger character able to defeat the first character with but one punch. Just like that, another powerhouse would appear."
"This was the dimension of gods; the scale of it all was just different. This is all just the product of childish arguments," Alovenus continued."
The key point here is the comparison between fictional characters and their author or "God." Transcending and establishing a setting where you surpass this author and "God," who should view you and your entire existence as finite compared to themselves, constitutes or at least should indicate an R>F transcendence.
I would love to hear your feedback about this approach and interpretation and whether or not it is useable.