A Suggestion regarding the tiering system

[IGunProFan2341]

Just a small suggestion but, regrading some of the tiers descriptions, like High 4-C and 4-B, I’ve seen couple of answers in Q&A websites like Quora, where they mention that some stars like UY scuti is around the size of the solar system and is larger than the sun which is a “large star” and the logic does not make any sense, im suggesting that we should change it to like “Characters or objects that can create/destroy a solar system, larger stars like UY scuti can be included in this tier for its large size” to solve this misunderstanding.

 

[Epyriel]

Just a small suggestion but, regrading some of the tiers descriptions, like High 4-C and 4-B, I’ve seen couple of answers in Q&A websites like Quora, where they mention that some stars like UY scuti is around the size of the solar system and is larger than the sun which is a “large star” and the logic does not make any sense, im suggesting that we should change it to like “Characters or objects that can create/destroy a solar system, larger stars like UY scuti can be included in this tier for its large size” to solve this misunderstanding.

Actually the Sun is used to mark the lower boundary of Star level (Tier 4-C), not Large Star level (Tier High 4-C) which is denoted at the lower end by Rigel (a star twice as massive as UY Scuti).

UY Scuti isn’t actually the size of the Solar System, it would only stretch to around the asteroid belt if placed where the Sun is. The energy needed to destroy it is far less than the energy needed to destroy the entire solar system with an outwards blast from the center, so there isn’t actually any overlap that requires a change in description.