A striking strength revision project?

[Ryukama]

@Ant Alright then.

 

[Antvasima]

I have tried to adjust the new list according to Darkanine's suggestions, but Dwarf Star Class causes some problems.

 

[Amelia_Lonelyheart]

I think Dwarf Star class should stay the same. It's a bit awkward and out of place, but theirs no alternative for it that I know of.

 

[Byakuya_"Senbonzakura"_Kuchiki]

I'm late but I'll be here around to help. Only on weekends.

 

[Fllflourine]

Not sure if I'll be able to help, I'm intending on trying to fix my absurd sleep schedule, and manage some real life stuff, after I go on a vacation, which starts just a few days after my current school year ends, which is about 1 and a half weeks from now.

 

[Antvasima]

@Darkanine

Well, I think that words like "lunar" makes the ratings harder to understand for visitors, and there are also inconsistencies if we start to use words like "high" and "low" instead of "large" and "small". On second thought, the original conversion list seems more straightforward and appropriate to me.

@Byakuya

Okay. Thank you for the help.

@Fllflourine

Okay. Thanks anyway.

 

[Promestein]

I much prefer Ever's suggestions, though I don't think using high / low instead of large / small is a good idea.

 

[Antvasima]

Yes, maybe just Continental, Planetary, and Stellar, without any other changes?

 

[Promestein]

That's good with me.

 

[Kavpeny]

I agree with the need for a revision. However, this thread has far too many random inputs on different topics, and as such, I would like to redirect all further discussion pertaining to the revised Striking Strength system to this thread.

Additionally, I also strongly recommend all members, particularly the staff, to follow the main thread, so as to remain up-to-date regarding the project and it's developments.