• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

A revision for a certain mothra leo

Status
Not open for further replies.
2,042
476
The remade profile for Mothra Leo is here.

Im not really changing the tiers, although I feel Eternal Mothra should have a 'Unknown. At least 5-B, likely High 3-A, possibly higher' tiering. He should at least be comparable to his imago/rainbow form, if not superior, considering this seems to be his final transformation.

Other than that, just added a gallery, collapsible Notable Attacks/Techniques section, and added a few touches on the P&A.
 
I can't speak for the tiering, but the file itself looks good.
However, Rainbow Mothra's paralysis and sleep powders could use more explicit scans, and the same goes for Lightspeed Mothra's time travel.
Eternal Mothra doesn't have scans, but if they are nowhere to be found, I guess references are enough.
 
I can't speak for the tiering, but the file itself looks good.
However, Rainbow Mothra's paralysis and sleep powders could use more explicit scans, and the same goes for Lightspeed Mothra's time travel.
Eternal Mothra doesn't have scans, but if they are nowhere to be found, I guess references are enough.
fair enough, I have edited it accordingly
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top