A bunch of creatures CRT (Boar, Giant Badger, Giant Goat, Giant Weasel, Slaad Tadpole, Rock Gnome, Wood Elf, and Sahuagin)

[Tllmbrg]

Tllmbrg/SandboxD&DRevisions1

vsbattles.fandom.com

The animals and Slaad just get an ability each
Rock Gnome and Wood Elf get new abilities from the 2024 PHB
Sahuagin is a general update based on a 2e book and clean-up

 

[AbaddonTheDisappointment]

Link you put doesn't work. I know it's supposed to be an & but it automatically sets it to that jumble of %2526 so yeah preferably fix that.

Anyways most of this seems fine just at a glance

 

[Tllmbrg]

Link you put doesn't work. I know it's supposed to be an & but it automatically sets it to that jumble of %2526 so yeah preferably fix that.

Edited the link

 

[Mr. Bambu]

Didn't know we even had Restoration, how about that.

I continue to ask that scans be added without being stripped of all context surrounding them, visitors are literally unable to discern that these scans are related to the characters they are stated to- as far as they are aware, they just say things like "Acrobatics +5", something that could easily be taken from another creature.

I think splitting spell lists by edition for things like the Priestess sets a bad precedent, doubly for the more general creature/class pages, which are something of a template for that creature rather than being exhaustive. I would rather display historical information as being alongside new releases unless the information has been directly retconned. It's not as though these are different forms of the creatures, but rather just updates.

's about it.

 

[Tllmbrg]

I continue to ask that scans be added without being stripped of all context surrounding them, visitors are literally unable to discern that these scans are related to the characters they are stated to- as far as they are aware, they just say things like "Acrobatics +5", something that could easily be taken from another creature.

The reference directs you to the source, I don't like slapping the entire page as a scan. This is a matter of page style so like, I am not gonna swap all the stuff, especially when a visitor can double check the source if they don't believe the scan came from there.

I think splitting spell lists by edition for things like the Priestess sets a bad precedent, doubly for the more general creature/class pages, which are something of a template for that creature rather than being exhaustive. I would rather display historical information as being alongside new releases unless the information has been directly retconned. It's not as though these are different forms of the creatures, but rather just updates.

This standard has been set already? You didn't say anything about it with the Derro so.
Either way, I disagree with showcasing them alongside each other, that gives a very warped perception of the spellcasting in my eyes.

 

[Mr. Bambu]

Either way, I disagree with showcasing them alongside each other, that gives a very warped perception of the spellcasting in my eyes.

I would say the same of this. I just didn't notice it with the Derro which, being fair, that CRT didn't list out explicit changes, it was a Scavenger Hunt CRT. I disagree with the separation, I will continue to begrudgingly accept your insistently shitty scans.

 

[Tllmbrg]

I would say the same of this. I just didn't notice it with the Derro which, being fair, that CRT didn't list out explicit changes, it was a Scavenger Hunt CRT.

Well this is not a topic I care that much for, and since I get to keep the scans I will just edit the page to remove that divide

 

[Tllmbrg]

I applied the CRT. Also for the Wood Elf I updated their range/Notable Attacks/Techniques as well due to the spells. Same for the Rock Gnome.