9-B Laurie Strode / Michael downgrade

[ThePrimalHunter]

Bump. So we all agree that this version of Michael is 9-C?

So far, yes

 

[AThe1412]

So far, yes

Then the change can be applied now I think since @Qawsedf234 agrees with it.

 

[HorrorHistory]

Bump. So we all agree that this version of Michael is 9-C?

I suppose

 

[Hank_J._Wimbleton_69]

Bump. So we all agree that this version of Michael is 9-C?

Now i thought about it, in the end of HK Michael hits Tommy's head with a baseball bat hard enough to explode his skull and destroy part of the said baseball bat. Eyeballing, around 1/3 of baseball bat was gone/destroyed, than this feat MIGHT be wall level depending on if we use pulverization or not. So "at least 9-C, possibly 9-B"? There is also a feat in H2018 where he off-screen deforms/breaks few bars of a spike fence, but the whole thing was off-screen and this is propably more 9-C rather than 9-B

 

[AThe1412]

Now i thought about it, in the end of HK Michael hits Tommy's head with a baseball bat hard enough to explode his skull and destroy part of the said baseball bat. Eyeballing, around 1/3 of baseball bat was gone/destroyed, than this feat MIGHT be wall level depending on if we use pulverization or not. So "at least 9-C, possibly 9-B"? There is also a feat in H2018 where he off-screen deforms/breaks few bars of a spike fence, but the whole thing was off-screen and this is propably more 9-C rather than 9-B

Pulverization seems far fetched but violent fragmentation could be a possibility. Either way, it'll only be 1/3 of the values on the calculation.

 

[Hank_J._Wimbleton_69]

Pulverization seems far fetched but violent fragmentation could be a possibility. Either way, it'll only be 1/3 of the values on the calculation

If you divide the pulv value in the calc by 3 or 4 it still would be wall level. But the feat doesn't show how the baseball bat was destroyed so this is a problem. That's why i said 9-C, possibly 9-B

 

[TheShape03]

Now i thought about it, in the end of HK Michael hits Tommy's head with a baseball bat hard enough to explode his skull and destroy part of the said baseball bat. Eyeballing, around 1/3 of baseball bat was gone/destroyed, than this feat MIGHT be wall level depending on if we use pulverization or not.

There is no evidence that this was pulverization, it may not even have been fragmentation as such, the bat could have simply broken into two pieces.

 

[Hank_J._Wimbleton_69]

I know, that's why i said 9-C, possibly 9-B

 

[TheShape03]

There is no "possibly 9-B" here.

Possibly​

Should be used to list a statistic for a character with some basis, but inconclusive due to the justification being vague or non-definitive. The probability of the justification in question for being reliable should be notable, but mild. This term should be used sparingly.

There is 0 evidence of pulverization.

 

[HorrorHistory]

Now i thought about it, in the end of HK Michael hits Tommy's head with a baseball bat hard enough to explode his skull and destroy part of the said baseball bat. Eyeballing, around 1/3 of baseball bat was gone/destroyed, than this feat MIGHT be wall level depending on if we use pulverization or not. So "at least 9-C, possibly 9-B"? There is also a feat in H2018 where he off-screen deforms/breaks few bars of a spike fence, but the whole thing was off-screen and this is propably more 9-C rather than 9-B

I’m pretty sure the bat just broke into 2 pieces. We don’t see anything further that suggests it pulverized or even fragmented.

 

[ThePrimalHunter]

Yeah, I'm very agains the "possibly 9-B" here. Unless there's actual proof of straight up pulverization of the bat then this would just be him splitting it in 2, which isn't Wall level at all

 

[Raincutter]

Now i thought about it, in the end of HK Michael hits Tommy's head with a baseball bat hard enough to explode his skull and destroy part of the said baseball bat. Eyeballing, around 1/3 of baseball bat was gone/destroyed, than this feat MIGHT be wall level depending on if we use pulverization or not. So "at least 9-C, possibly 9-B"? There is also a feat in H2018 where he off-screen deforms/breaks few bars of a spike fence, but the whole thing was off-screen and this is propably more 9-C rather than 9-B

the fence looks entirely intact to me. I still think the kitchen island feat should be looked at.

 

[Hank_J._Wimbleton_69]

the fence looks entirely intact to me. I still think the kitchen island feat should be looked at.

The fence istelf is intact but you can see few of the bars of it was damaged, the damage on the bars wasn't here before Michael killing Oscar (it was the name of the kid in the movie i guess) and than off-screen put his corpse on the gate. Not that the feat is very usable, it honestly doesn't go beyond "vaguely superhuman".

 

[HorrorHistory]

Maybe a “9-C, likely higher” could work.

 

[HorrorHistory]

Bump

 

[HorrorHistory]

So, Laurie's LS should be changed to Peak Human - Class 1 (Whichever one), Michael's durability in 78 should be Street level, Blumhouse's Michael should be 9-C, Green's Laurie should have Peak Human speed (I think. Maybe comparable to Michael, correct me if in wrong), and Corey should just be 9-C

 

[Raincutter]

So, Laurie's LS should be changed to Peak Human - Class 1 (Whichever one), Michael's durability in 78 should be Street level, Blumhouse's Michael should be 9-C, Green's Laurie should have Peak Human speed (I think. Maybe comparable to Michael, correct me if in wrong), and Corey should just be 9-C

honestly idk about 9-C for 2018 Myers. Someone shared this excerpt with me from the 2018 novel, and he apparently tanks an explosion:
"All three women, leaning over to witness the end, felt the concussive blast as flames engulfed the basement, consuming everything flammable within it."

 

[AThe1412]

honestly idk about 9-C for 2018 Myers. Someone shared this excerpt with me from the 2018 novel, and he apparently tanks an explosion:
"All three women, leaning over to witness the end, felt the concussive blast as flames engulfed the basement, consuming everything flammable within it."

Here's the scene in case you're wondering.

 

[Raincutter]

Here's the scene in case you're wondering.

yeah this is why I'm iffy on it. The movie does seem to have some sort of blast judging by the sound, but the overall finale is noticeably different in the novel with Myers being knocked on his ass when they set the basement alight, Karen shoots Michael in the chest instead of the face with a pistol instead of a rifle, etc, it might have been an actual explosion in the earlier draft the novel is based on

 

[ThePrimalHunter]

honestly idk about 9-C for 2018 Myers. Someone shared this excerpt with me from the 2018 novel, and he apparently tanks an explosion:
"All three women, leaning over to witness the end, felt the concussive blast as flames engulfed the basement, consuming everything flammable within it."

That's a fireball not an explosion. Explosions require pressure. There is no pressure there, its just a large puff of fire from the gasoline catching fire. You wouldn't call a flamethrower an explosion. And I'd doubt he'd scale to it either

 

[HorrorHistory]

Bump

 

[Raincutter]

Bump

Is anyone gonna apply the changes?